MHB How Do You Calculate Average Event Attendance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ryakaki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
ryakaki
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all! :D

I have a very basic (not basic enough for me apparently) problem. I'm trying to find out on average how many times people have attended an event. There's a total of 12 events. Below is a simplified version of my table with number of events in the first column and number of people who attended one, two,..., twelve events in the second column. I'm not entirely sure how to do this, but would it just be $$(1*100 + 2*200 + ... + 12*1200) / (100 +200 + ... + 1200) $$? Any help for this new guy would be appreciated! Thank you!

1 100
2 200
3 300
4 400
5 500
6 600
7 700
8 800
9 900
10 1000
11 1100
12 1200
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Average attendment problem

Hi ryakaki, (Wave)

Welcome to MHB!

Does the first column refer to the event number, like the first event, the second event, etc.? Or does it refer to the number of total events visited? If the latter that would mean that 100 people visited just 1 event but 1200 people visited all 12 events. Can you clear that up for me?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top