How Do You Calculate Insertion Loss in a T Network?

  • Thread starter Thread starter David J
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss Network
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the insertion loss in a T network using a provided transmission matrix and specific resistor values. Participants are attempting to follow an example from their notes, which includes a formula for insertion loss and specific values for resistors. The context includes homework-related problem-solving and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for insertion loss and attempts to calculate it using given resistor values, but arrives at a different result than the example.
  • Another participant points out a potential error in the transmission matrix regarding the D term, suggesting it should involve R_B instead of R_C.
  • Further contributions question the correctness of the D term and propose alternative formulations based on the matrix structure.
  • Some participants identify mistakes in the arithmetic and parentheses placement in the calculations, which may lead to incorrect results.
  • A participant acknowledges an arithmetic mistake and expresses intent to reattempt the calculation with corrections in mind.
  • There is discussion about the relationship between the resistors R_A and R_B, noting that they are equal in this case, which may affect the calculations.
  • One participant shares their revised approach to the problem, applying the correct terms and values to the insertion loss formula.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are errors in the example provided, particularly concerning the D term of the transmission matrix. However, there is no consensus on the correct approach to the calculations, as multiple interpretations and corrections are proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in the example problem, including unclear definitions of terms and the possibility of typographical errors in the provided matrix. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions that may affect the final results.

David J
Gold Member
Messages
140
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


[/B]
I am trying to follow a given example as part of my notes. The example is described below

Using the equation below calculate the insertion loss of the T network of figure 20 (figure 20 is in the attachment) given the values in the table.

I am given a transmission matrix for the T network and values as follows:-

##R_S = 300\Omega##
##R_L = 300\Omega##
##R_A = 200\Omega##
##R_B = 200\Omega##
##R_C = 300\Omega##

Homework Equations


[/B]
The example equation we are given is as shown below

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac {AR_L + B +(CR_L + D)R_S)^2 }{R_S +R_L}\right]##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The example solution I am given in my notes is shown below in its entirety :-

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac {AR_L + B +(CR_L + D)R_S)^2 }{R_S +R_L}\right]##

So ##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{ 1 + \left(\frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L+R_A+R_B+\frac{R_A R_B}{R_C}+\left(\frac{1}{R_C} R_L+\left(1+\frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)\right)R_S}{R_S+R_L}\right]##

So ##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{ 1 + \left(\frac{200}{300}\right)300+200+200+\frac{200\times200}{300}+\left(\frac{1}{300} 300+\left(1+\frac{200}{300}\right)\right)300}{300+300}\right]##

The example then moves straight to

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left(3.056\right)##

and then an answer of

##A_{IL} = 9.70dB##

The above is what I am given as an example. My problem is that even when I follow each step as shown above I cannot arrive at ##3.056##

I end up with ##3.648055556## which gives an answer of ##11.241dB## which is not correct.

My working out is shown below.

Starting with

##= 20\log\left[\frac{ 1 + \left(\frac{200}{300}\right)300+200+200+\frac{200\times200}{300}+\left(\frac{1}{300} 300+\left(1+\frac{200}{300}\right)\right)300}{300+300}\right]##

##= 20\log\left[\frac{\left(1.666666667\right)\times833.3+\left(1+1.666666667\right)\times300}{600}\right]##

##= 20\log\left[\frac{\left(1.666666667\right)\times833.3+800}{600}\right]##

##= 20\log\left[\frac{2,188.833334}{600}\right]##

##= 20\log\left(3.648055556\right)##

So using my working out I get ##A_{IL} = 11.241dB## which is in correct

As I said in the beginning of this post this is an example question I am given and I am trying to work my way through it. I just need any advice as to why my final result does not match the example. I am obviously doing something wrong somewhere, I just cannot see where. I am thinking its to do with rounding off numbers etc and I am not able to program recurring numbers into my calculator (casio fx-100MS) so that may have something to do with it. Maybe I have messed up the calculations out with the brackets or something along those lines. Any advice would, as always be most appreciated.

Thanks

 

Attachments

  • Insertion Loss question.JPG
    Insertion Loss question.JPG
    13.7 KB · Views: 779
Physics news on Phys.org
In the attached image it shows the D term of the matrix being given by

##D = 1 + \frac{R_A}{R_B}##

But in their solution they appear to have used ##R_C## in place of ##R_B##. That is, they've employed the term A rather than D. So either the attachment is incorrect or they've used the wrong term.
 
I think the D element of the given transmission matrix is wrong. It should be 1+RB/RC, not 1+RA/RB.
 
When you went from here:
##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac {AR_L + B +(CR_L + D)R_S)^2 }{R_S +R_L}\right]##

To here:
So ##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{ 1 + \left(\frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L+R_A+R_B+\frac{R_A R_B}{R_C}+\left(\frac{1}{R_C} R_L+\left(1+\frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)\right)R_S}{R_S+R_L}\right]##

You messed up your parentheses in the first term after the left [. You should have:

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left( 1 + \frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L+R_A+R_B+\frac{R_A R_B}{R_C}+\left(\frac{1}{R_C} R_L+\left(1+\frac{R_B}{R_C}\right)\right)R_S}{R_S+R_L}\right]##

And, as I said in the previous post, the D term of the given transmission matrix is wrong, but it doesn't matter because RA = RB.
 
You made a couple of mistakes going from here:
##= 20\log\left[\frac{ 1 + \left(\frac{200}{300}\right)300+200+200+\frac{200\times200}{300}+\left(\frac{1}{300} 300+\left(1+\frac{200}{300}\right)\right)300}{300+300}\right]##

to here:
##= 20\log\left[\frac{\left(1.666666667\right)\times833.3+\left(1+1.666666667\right)\times300}{600}\right]##

You should have gotten:

##= 20\log\left[\frac{\left(1.666666667\right)\times 300+533.3+\left(1+1.666666667\right)\times300}{600}\right]##
 
Good morning and thanks for the information. This gives me something to work on today. I can see where the D term is wrong and I think that is typo from the university question paper. I have attached the full example question and answer for your info.

I also attached the question I will shortly attempt (question 4) as this shows what I think is the "correct D term" of the matrix, as you have suggested

I can also see where i put the bracket in the wrong place on the first parenthesis. I don't know how I missed that because its written in the example answer in black and white exactly how to go about working out so I will put this down to an arithmetic mistake. I have spent quite a long time on this now and I simply did not see it

I will re attempt this example today to try and match what they say I should get.

Appreciated as always. thanks
 

Attachments

  • Example question answer.jpg
    Example question answer.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 678
  • Question 4.jpg
    Question 4.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 605
David J said:
I also attached the question I will shortly attempt (question 4) as this shows what I think is the "correct D term" of the matrix, as you have suggested
Yes, that shows the correct terms for the ABCD matrix for the given network.

The ABCD matrix for a 2-port network is fairly easy to find, and I really should have done it earlier when I suspected there was an issue with the D term used in the provided solution. Thankfully @The Electrician picked up the ball there.

When each component is either in series or a shunt, they have 2 x 2 matrix forms that can be multiplied in succession to arrive at the overall ABCD matrix. In this instance RA and RB are series connected to the input and output respectively, while RC is a shunt lying between them.

Here's a quick derivation for the ABCD matrix for this network that I've done using MathCad:
upload_2017-2-2_6-17-8.png
 
The Electrician said:
When you went from here:
##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac {AR_L + B +(CR_L + D)R_S)^2 }{R_S +R_L}\right]##

To here:
So ##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{ 1 + \left(\frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L+R_A+R_B+\frac{R_A R_B}{R_C}+\left(\frac{1}{R_C} R_L+\left(1+\frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)\right)R_S}{R_S+R_L}\right]##

You messed up your parentheses in the first term after the left [. You should have:

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left( 1 + \frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L+R_A+R_B+\frac{R_A R_B}{R_C}+\left(\frac{1}{R_C} R_L+\left(1+\frac{R_B}{R_C}\right)\right)R_S}{R_S+R_L}\right]##

Hello again. Its a bit clearer now thanks. Looking at the first equation above i failed to recognize ##AR_L## as, effectively ##\left(1 + \frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L##
If I had noticed this then I would probably have gone with

##\left(1.66666667\right)R_L## = ##\left(1.66666667\right)300## = ##500##

I have managed to contact the university regarding the error in the example question matrix and they did confirm its wrong but as you have pointed out here, in this case, ##R_A=R_B## so it was not the reason I miscalculated. The reason was down to me failing to recognize ##AR_L##

I will have a go at the question now
 
So approaching the actual question (attached) i get the following

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left( 1 + \frac{R_A}{R_C}\right)R_L+R_A+R_B+\frac{R_A R_B}{R_C}+\left(\frac{1}{R_C}R_L+\left(1+\frac{R_B}{R_C}\right)\right)R_S}{R_S+R_L}\right]##

Input the given data and simplify

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left( 1 + \frac{13}{213}\right)\times100+13+13+\frac{13\times13}{213}+\left(\frac{1}{213}100+\left(1+\frac{13}{213}\right)\right)75}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left(1.06103\right)\times100+13+13+\frac{13\times13}{213}+\left(\frac{1}{213}100+\left(1+\frac{13}{213}\right)\right)75}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left(106.103\right)+26.793+\left(\frac{1}{213}100+\left(1+\frac{13}{213}\right)\right)75}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left(106.103\right)+26.793+\left(0.4695+\left(1+\frac{13}{213}\right)\right)75}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left(106.103\right)+26.793+\left(0.4695+1.06103\right)75}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{\left(106.103\right)+26.793+\left(1.53083\right)75}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{106.103+26.793+114.81225}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left[\frac{247.70825}{175}\right]##

##A_{IL} = 20\log\left(1.415475714\right)##

So ##A_{IL} = 3.01805dB##

I believe this to be correct. Any comments, as always much appreciated, thanks
 

Attachments

  • Question 4.jpg
    Question 4.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 545
  • #10
Looks good. You'll want to round your result to a couple of decimal places.
 
  • #11
Thanks again

so the final result will be ##A_{IL}=3.02 dB##

much appreciated, thanks again for help and advice gents
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K