How Do You Calculate Electric Fields and Forces Between Charged Rods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter acedeno
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric fields and forces between two charged rods positioned along the x-axis. Each rod has a uniform positive charge distributed along its length, and participants are exploring how to express the electric field produced by one rod at points along the positive x-axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the integral for calculating the electric field, questioning the representation of variables and the limits of integration. There is an exploration of how to correctly express the distance between points on the x-axis and the charge elements.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's mathematical expressions and clarifying the roles of different variables in the integral. Some participants suggest modifications to improve clarity and accuracy in the setup of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the use of variables in the integral and the interpretation of distances involved in the calculations. Additionally, there are reminders about forum etiquette regarding posting frequency.

acedeno
Messages
34
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Two thin rods of length L lie along the x-axis, one between x = a and x = a + L, and the other between
x = –a and x = –a – L. Each rod has positive charge Q distributed uniformly along its length.
a. Calculate the electric field as a function of x produced by the rod on the left hand side
(from –a – L to –a) at points along the positive x-axis.
b. Determine the magnitude of the force that one rod exerts on the other.

Homework Equations


E=∫[dq/4πε_naught*r^2] where dq=λdx for a line of charge

The Attempt at a Solution


Well since for part a, they only want the electric field in the positive x-axis I came up with:

E=∫from -a to -a-L of [λdx/4πε_naught*(-a-L+x)^2

giving me:

E=L/2a+L(2a+2L) when the integral is evaluated from -a to -a-L. - I'm aware I need to multiply my constants back in but for right now, I'm just worried about the integral.

Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
acedeno said:
bump
Please read and follow the rules of these Forums. Wait 24 hours before bumping.

Regarding your integral: E=∫from -a to -a-L of [λdx/4πε_naught*(-a-L+x)^2 ,

What does x represent?

You seem to have used x for two different things in the same expression.
 
x is suppose to represent where you are on the x axis.

-regarding the bump, sorry it won't happen again.
 
acedeno said:
x is suppose to represent where you are on the x axis.

-regarding the bump, sorry it won't happen again.

But you have (λ dx) in the integral, so in that sense, you're using x as the integration variable.

Use something like x0 (or some variable like u or s), for the place at which you are finding E. You then need to express the distance from x0 to the point x on the rod, over which you are integrating. --- r = x0 - x .
 
Sorry, I'm not following. The way I see it, when you take all the constants out you are just integrating dx/(-a-L+x)^2
 
Yes, but that's not what you should be integrating.

(-a-L+x) is the distance between point x, and point (a + L) on the x axis.

What would the integral be if you were finding E at a fixed location, such as at x = 1.357 meter, on the x-axis ?
 
Okay, I think I know what you mean.

E=∫kdq/r^2 let dq=λdl and r =(a+x), the distance from the end of the rod to a +x value
E=λk/(a+x)^2∫dl -integrating from -a-L to -aE=λk/(a+x)^2[(-a)-(-a-L)]

E=λkL/(a+x)^2

How's that look?

edit: I decided to use k rather than 1 over 4pi epsilon naught
 
No. r should be the distance between the element of charge, dq, and x. So, r = x - l.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
2K