NascentOxygen said:
So the correct answer lies between ln(9) and ln(11)?
Those are the extremes, yes, but the fractional error distributions differ slightly between x and ln(x).
For small δx/x the fractional change in ln(x) is δ[ln(x)]/ln(x)] ~ [1/ln(x)] δx/x = 0.4343.
E.g. for δx = +1 and x = 10,
fractional change in ln(x) = [ln(11) - ln(10)]/ln(10) = 0.04139 for fractional change in x = 1/10 = 0.1000. So δln(x)/ ln(x) = 0.4139 δx/x.
but if δx = 0.1, fract. change in ln(x) is [ln(10.1) - ln(10)]/ln(10) = 0.004321 for a fractional change in x of 0.1/10 = 0.0100. So δln(x)/ln(x) = 0.4321 δx/x, pretty close to 0.4343.
Which as I said is not a big difference. So with little error, you can say that the fractional error in ln(x) is proportional to the fractional error in x, that ratio being 0.4343, if |δx/x| < 0.1.
But say δx = 5, then
fract. change in ln(x) = [ln(15) - ln(10)]/ln(10) = 0.1761 for δx/x = 0.5, so that ratio is 0.1761/0.5 = 0.3522 which is quite a ways from 0.4343.