How Do You Calculate Potential Energy in a 2D Oscillator System with Springs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter forestmine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillators
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy in a two-dimensional oscillator system involving a puck attached to four springs on a frictionless table. The problem requires understanding how the potential energy relates to the displacements of the puck from its equilibrium position.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the potential energy expression based on the forces exerted by the springs, expressing uncertainty about the relationship between the potential and the spring lengths.
  • Some participants question the setup of the problem, particularly the role of the unstretched length of the springs and how it affects the potential energy calculation.
  • Others suggest considering the potential energy in terms of the individual spring contributions and how they relate to the coordinates of the puck.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering corrections and clarifications regarding the relationships between force and potential energy. There is a recognition of the need to incorporate the unstretched lengths of the springs into the potential energy formulation, but no consensus has been reached on the exact approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions regarding the spring lengths and their impact on the potential energy, as well as the need for a proper coordinate system to analyze the problem effectively.

forestmine
Messages
201
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A puck with mass m sits on a horizontal, frictionless table attached to four identical springs (constant k and unstreched length l_0). The initial lengths of the spring a are not equal to the unstretched lengths. Find the potential for small displacements x,y and show that it has the form 1/2 * k' * r[itex]^{2}[/itex] with r[itex]^{2}[/itex] = x[itex]^{2}[/itex]+ y[itex]^{2}[/itex].

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm honestly at a loss with this problem. I know that the total force is F=-kr, where F[itex]_{}x[/itex] = -kx and F[itex]_{}y[/itex] = -ky.

I also know that my potential is minus the gradient of the force. If I were to take the gradient of F, where F = -kx(i) -ky(j), I get F= -k(i) -k(j). Not really sure where to go from here, or if I'm on the right track for that matter.

I'm obviously not looking for the answer, just some help in the right direction. I don't think I fully understand it conceptually to be able to work it analytically. Any tips would be greatly appreciated!

EDIT// Here's some work I've done since posting. Still unsure of how to continue.

To account for all possible positions of the spring,

r1^2=x^2 + (a-y)^2
r2^2=x^2 + (a+y)^2
r3^2=(x+a)^2 + y^2
r4^2=(x-a)^2 + y^2

Now, r will be some variation of the above, so I summed the above 4 equations. I would then think to use U=1/2 * k * r^2, where r^2 is the sum of the above equations. I feel like I'm missing something, though.

EDIT 2// In fact, I definitely don't feel as though that's suitable, because it says that the potential is not at all dependent on l, which of course is false.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got things backwards: the force is the gradient of the potential, ##\mathbf{F} = - \nabla U##. Also, the forces should involve the quantity ##a-l_0##.
 
Whoops, that was a bad mistake. Thanks for catching that.

Though I'm still not really sure what to do. My potential can then be written in terms of x and y components, right?

For instance,

U_x = 1/2 * k * rx^2, but I don't really see what r ought to be. I understand that there should be some dependence on l_0, but I honestly have no idea how. Unless we can essentially rewrite the equations for r_n, with (a-l_0)^2, (a+l_0)^2, etc.

Sorry, I'm so lost on this problem. I know that there are two methods, one of which involves a taylor expansion, and the other, a second derivative of the potential function, but again, I don't even know what my potential function looks like in this case.
 
Set up the coordinate system so that the mass is sitting at the origin when it's in equilibrium and the springs lie along the axes. The end of the springs lying on the +x axis will be at the point (a,0). What's the potential energy in the spring when the mass is at (0,0)? What's the potential energy in the spring when the mass is at the point (x,y)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K