How Do You Calculate Radiation Count Rate for Different Energies?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the radiation count rate for different energy levels of a radioactive source, specifically focusing on 185MeV and 1MeV photons. Participants are exploring the implications of material properties on photon absorption and intensity calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between photon energy and count rate, questioning the assumptions regarding material depth and surface area. There are attempts to apply the mass attenuation coefficient in calculations, and participants are exploring how to integrate photon penetration over the material.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the absorption characteristics of different energy photons and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the mass attenuation coefficient and the importance of depth in calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the correct method or final values.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available for their calculations. There is a focus on understanding the underlying physics rather than arriving at a definitive solution.

v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've attached the problem sheet and my attempt at the problem. I've completed all the parts except for the last part, where I have to calculate the count rate of the radioactive source. The answers should be 6000 counts for 185MeV and 4650 counts for 1MeV.

I'm not sure if it's simply 1000x6 for the 185MeV one. And I couldn't get the right answer for the 1MeV one.

Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • nuclearphoto.jpg
    nuclearphoto.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 463
  • nuclearphoto2.jpg
    nuclearphoto2.jpg
    23.7 KB · Views: 451
Physics news on Phys.org
Those 185keV-photons are absorbed quickly - the depth of the material (as seen by the detector) does not matter, only the surface area is relevant (this is different from your result). You can just multiply the number with 6 to get a good approximation.
If all photons would penetrate the material, the orientation of the bar would not matter.

For the 1MeV-photons, you have to take the depth into account: For an emission x cm away from the air (towards the detector), how many photons reach the detector? Can you integrate this over the whole material?
 
Doesn't the mass attenuation coefficient take into account of a 3D source? Should I use it in the equation I=I_0 exp(-mu * x) ? Can I say that the final intensity I for case (A) is 1000? Then use this to find the initial intensity in case (A). Then assuming the initial intensity is same in (A) and (B), use it to find the final intensity in (B)? Using this method, I get 21600 counts which isn't correct.
 
Last edited:
v_pino said:
Doesn't the mass attenuation coefficient take into account of a 3D source?
What do mean with that? I don't find an interpretation where the answer is "yes".
Should I use it in the equation I=I_0 exp(-mu * x) ?
That is the point of this coefficient.
Can I say that the final intensity I for case (A) is 1000?
Sure, that is given. That is not the I in your formula, however, as you don't have a constant x for all regions of the source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K