How Do You Calculate the Activity Coefficient of H+ from pH?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the activity coefficient of H+ from a measured pH of 1.092 for 0.100 M HCl at 25°C, the Debye-Huckel equation was initially used, yielding a value of 0.825, which was deemed incorrect. The discussion emphasizes that the calculation should focus on the experimental value rather than theoretical predictions. Participants clarify the relationship between pH and concentration, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Understanding the dependence of pH on concentration is essential for determining the correct activity coefficient. Accurate calculations require careful consideration of experimental conditions and the specific equations applicable to the scenario.
emc92
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
The measured pH of 0.100 M HCl at 25°C is 1.092. From this information, calculate the activity coefficient of H+.


I tried using the Debye-Huckel equation and got 0.825 but it's not right. I don't know how else to solve for the activity coefficient.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are not asked to calculate theoretical value, but to calculate experimental value.

What is pH that you have just measured? How does it depend on the concentration?
 
i figured this one out. thanks!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top