How Do You Calculate the Average Number of Photons in a Cavity at Temperature T?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average Photons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the average number of photons in a cavity at temperature T using the Bose-Einstein statistics. The key equation derived is ##N = \frac{gV}{h^3}\int \frac{1}{e^{(E-\mu)/kT}-1}dp^3##, where ##\mu = 0## for photons. The method involves photon mode counting and integrating over the spectral density, leading to the closed-form solution for the mean number of photons: ##I=16 \pi \zeta(3) (\frac{kT}{hc})^3##, with ##\zeta(3)## being the Riemann zeta function. The discussion confirms that the integral is indeed identical when considering the polarization factor ##g=2##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Bose-Einstein statistics
  • Grand canonical partition function
  • Photon mode counting techniques
  • Riemann zeta function
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the grand canonical partition function in statistical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of setting the chemical potential to zero for photons
  • Learn about the integration techniques for evaluating complex integrals in statistical physics
  • Investigate the applications of the Riemann zeta function in quantum statistics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics, quantum optics, and thermodynamics, will benefit from this discussion.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Calculate the mean number of photons in a cavity at temperature T and the mean energy per photon.

Homework Equations


In the large volume limit, the log of grand canonical partition function is: ##log(Z_g) = \frac{gV}{h^3}\int log(1-e^{(E-\mu)/kT})dp^3 ##, with g - spin degeneracy, E energy, p - momentum and ##\mu## - chemical potential.

Also the average number of particles is given by ##N = \lambda \frac{\partial log(Z_g)}{\partial \lambda}|_{T,V}##, with ##\lambda = e^{\mu/kT}##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I calculated N using the above formula and I obtained: ##N = \frac{gV}{h^3}\int \frac{1}{e^{(E-\mu)/kT}-1}dp^3##. This is for a normal Bose-Einstein gas. Now for a photon I take ##\mu = 0## and ##E=h\nu## and I plug in in this equation. Is this correct? If not, how should I proceed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you use the Bose function for the mean occupancy off a state is ## \frac{1}{e^{\frac{hc}{\lambda k T}}-1} ## the chemical potential ## \mu ## is set to zero for reasons that I'm not entirely sure. ## \\ ## Anyway, the photon mode counting can proceed in a couple of ways, but I like to use a method that F. Reif uses: ## e^{ik_xx}=e^{ik_x (x+L_x)} ##. This means ## k_x L_x =n_x (2 \pi) ## and similarly for y and z. This means the number of photon modes is ## \Delta N=\Delta^3 n=V \frac{\Delta^3 k}{(2 \pi)^3} ##. Then ## \Delta^3 k=4 \pi k^2 \, dk ## and ## k=\frac{2 \pi}{\lambda} ##. There is also a factor of 2 for photon polarization. You can write the expression entirely in terms of a spectral density ## f(\lambda) d \lambda ##. (We counted photon modes. Don't forget to include the Bose factor for mean occupancy of the state(mode).) ## \\ ## You then integrate over ## d \lambda ## from ## 0 ## to ## +\infty ## to get the mean number of photons in the volume ## V ## at temperature ## T ##. ## \\ ## Editing: Question is, is your integral identical to this, with polarization factor ## g=2 ##, and I believe the answer is yes. You can use ## E_p=\frac{hc}{\lambda} ## and work entirely with wavelength. A google of the subject shows the integral that you have can be evaluated in closed form, but it is a somewhat difficult one. The answer they give is ## I=16 \pi \zeta(3) (\frac{kT}{hc})^3 ##, where ## \zeta ## is the Riemann zeta function. ## \zeta(3)=1.202 ## (approximately).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K