How Do You Calculate the Integral of e^x from 0 to 1 Using Riemann Sums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter angel_eyez
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the integral of e^x from 0 to 1 using Riemann sums, explicitly avoiding the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Participants detail the steps involved in setting up the Riemann sum, including defining delta x as 1/n and using the limit as n approaches infinity. The calculations lead to a geometric series representation, which is crucial for deriving the integral's value. Ultimately, the results suggest that the approximations for Rn converge towards 1.72, indicating potential errors in the initial equations used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann sums
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of geometric series
  • Basic proficiency in exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Riemann sums in depth
  • Learn about geometric series and their applications
  • Explore the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for comparison
  • Practice calculating limits involving exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians interested in numerical integration methods, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Riemann sums and their applications in evaluating integrals.

angel_eyez
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Reimann's Law..maajoor Helpp!

1. Use Riemann sum ( do NOT use fundamental theorum of Calculus) to calculate
(integral) b= 1 and a =0 e^x dx


Attempt:

(delta x)=b-a/n 1-0/n =1/n
xi = 1/n

(integral) b=1 a=0 sigmaf(xi)deltax
limn->infin sigma f(i/n)1/n
use eqn to get...limn->infin 1/nsigma{e^(i/n)}
limn->infin 1/n e^1/ni
limn->infi 1/ne^1/n n(n+1)/2
limn->infin 1/n e^1/2(n+1)

then sub for n (table n | Rn where n =40,100,500,1000,5000 and Rn should be close to 1.72(got that using FTC2)...so the eqn must be wrong :D

3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
angel_eyez said:
1. Use Riemann sum ( do NOT use fundamental theorum of Calculus) to calculate
(integral) b= 1 and a =0 e^x dx


Attempt:

(delta x)=b-a/n 1-0/n =1/n
xi = 1/n

(integral) b=1 a=0 sigmaf(xi)deltax
limn->infin sigma f(i/n)1/n
use eqn to get...limn->infin 1/nsigma{e^(i/n)}
Use what equation? This is the crucial part!
You can rewrite this sum as
\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=0}^n (e^{1/n})^i
That's a geometric series with "common ratio" e1/n: its sum is
\frac{1}{n}\frac{1- e^{(n+1)/n}}{1- e^{1/n}}

limn->infin 1/n e^1/ni
limn->infi 1/ne^1/n n(n+1)/2
limn->infin 1/n e^1/2(n+1)

then sub for n (table n | Rn where n =40,100,500,1000,5000 and Rn should be close to 1.72(got that using FTC2)...so the eqn must be wrong :D

3.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K