Calculating area using sigma notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The question involves using sigma notation of Riemann sums to find the area under the graph of ##x^2+\sqrt{1+2x}##, specifically within the interval [4, 6]. Participants are discussing various approaches to calculate this area, including the implications of taking limits as n approaches infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of squaring the expression to eliminate the square root, while others express confusion about the initial calculations and the significance of the terms involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the setup and calculations. Some have suggested numerical methods for approximating the sum, while others are exploring the implications of using Riemann sums and the potential for integrating directly.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern regarding the interpretation of the area under the curve, with some participants initially questioning whether the area might be infinite. The discussion also reflects a need for clarity in the problem statement and the calculations being performed.

Zack K
Messages
166
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


The question involves using sigma notation of Riemann sums to find the area under the graph of ##x^2+\sqrt {1+2x}##. I managed to calculate most of the values and I have ##16+\frac 8 3 + \Sigma {\frac 2 n \sqrt {9 + \frac {4i} n}}##

Homework Equations

[/B]
##\Sigma i= \frac {n(n+1)} 2##
##\Sigma i^2= \frac {n(n+1)(2n+1)} 6##

The Attempt at a Solution


What I can think of doing to get rid of the root is to square the whole expression, since the area is equal to the expression and I will get area2. Then I can just square root my final answer to get the actual area. But I'm not sure if that will work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zack K said:
the area under the graph
Wouldn't that area be infinity ? Please post a complete problem statement
 
BvU said:
Wouldn't that area be infinity ? Please post a complete problem statement
Sorry my bad. It's between the interval [4, 6]. and n→infinity
 
First term alone should already yield around 50. Whence the 16 ? the 8/3 ?
Please post your steps in more detail.

Zack K said:
square the whole expression, since the area is equal to the expression and I will get area2
O, is that so ? So the area of ##\sin^2 x## is the area of ##\sin x## squared ?
 
Last edited:
Zack K said:

Homework Statement


The question involves using sigma notation of Riemann sums to find the area under the graph of ##x^2+\sqrt {1+2x}##. I managed to calculate most of the values and I have ##16+\frac 8 3 + \Sigma {\frac 2 n \sqrt {9 + \frac {4i} n}}##

Homework Equations

[/B]
##\Sigma i= \frac {n(n+1)} 2##
##\Sigma i^2= \frac {n(n+1)(2n+1)} 6##

The Attempt at a Solution


What I can think of doing to get rid of the root is to square the whole expression, since the area is equal to the expression and I will get area2. Then I can just square root my final answer to get the actual area. But I'm not sure if that will work.

No: it won't work. We have ##(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b})^2 \neq (a + b)##, so it does not even work for just two terms.
 
Ray Vickson said:
No: it won't work. We have ##(\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b})^2 \neq (a + b)##, so it does not even work for just two terms.
So what's recommended that I do? I know that I have to isolate i, but I can't seem to figure it out.
 
BvU said:
Please post your steps in more detail
 
Zack K said:
So what's recommended that I do? I know that I have to isolate i, but I can't seem to figure it out.
If you are given a value of ##n##, such as ##n = 30##, you can compute the 30-term sum numerically. If you use something like a spreadsheet, or Matlab, or Maple, or Mathematica, etc., it should not be hard. Even summing ##n = 1000## or more such terms should be do-able in a second or two, but doing it manually might take a few hours.

Paradoxically, in this case doing the ##n = \infty## sum (= the integral) is quite easy, but the finite sums are much harder.
 
You could set up a Riemann sum using horizontal rectangles, i.e., integrate with respect to y, to avoid the square root.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K