How Do You Calculate the Kinetic Energy of Particles in Relativistic Decay?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves the decay of a K_0 particle into two pions, with one pion at rest in the laboratory frame. The task is to calculate the kinetic energy of the moving pion and the K_0 particle prior to decay, within the context of special relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of energy and momentum principles, expressing concern about the distinction between rest mass and relativistic mass. Some participants suggest focusing on momentum conservation to reduce the number of unknowns in the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the relationships between energy, momentum, and kinetic energy in the context of the problem. There is a recognition that the original poster's approach may be overly complicated, and guidance has been offered regarding the sufficiency of equations needed to solve for the kinetic energies.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the terminology used for mass in the context of special relativity, with some participants advocating for the exclusive use of rest mass. The original poster expresses confusion about the clarity of the concepts involved.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


A K_0 particle has a mass of 497.7 MeV/c^2. It decays into a -∏ and +∏, each having a mass of 139.6 MeV/c^2. Following the decay of the K_0, one of the pions is at rest in the laboratory. Determine the kinetic energy of the other pion after the decay and of the K_0 prior to the decay


Homework Equations


E = γmc^2 = mc^2 + K


The Attempt at a Solution


This is the exact wording of the problem from my textbook. I feel like in a chapter meant to be an introduction to special relativity they would specify whether we are talking about rest mass's or relativistic masses. The semi-general consensus amongst my peers is to do the problem as if all mass's given are rest masses.

Kinetic energy of K_0 particle before decay:
(γ-1)mc^2 = Kinetic Energy
and the total energy is γmc^2

Since the total energy before the decay is γmc^2, and energy has to be conserved in all reference frames, in the reference frame of the lab where one of the ∏ particles is at rest
I think I can put
Rest mass energy + kinetic energy of K_0 particle = rest mass energy of both ∏ particles + the kinetic energy of one of them.

So now I have two equations and three unknowns, being γ and the two kinetic energies...

This may not be the most clearest thing I've ever typed but special relativity isn't exactly clear in my head either X_x.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass is always "rest mass". Forget "relativistic mass". Scientists got rid of that concept some decades ago.

Momentum conservation gives you the missing equation. I would not use three unknowns, it is sufficient to consider γ (or v, or p, does not matter) for the moving pion and the kaon.
 
i'm still a bit confused, is the point your trying to make that I only need two equations to solve for the two kinetic energies and gamma because of how gamma and kinetic energy are naturally connected or something?
 
Yep, the only thing you need (on this level of discussion) are energy-momentum conservation and the on-shell conditions for the particles, i.e.,
E_1=E_1'+E_2', \quad \vec{p}_1=\vec{p}_1'+\vec{p}_2', E_1^2=m_{\mathrm{K}}^2 c^4 + c^2 \vec{p}_1^2, \quad E_j'{}^2=m_{\pi}^2 c^4 + c^2 \vec{p}_j'^2.
Here (E_1/c,\vec{p}_1 denotes the four-momentum of the Kaon and E_j'/c,\vec{p}_j' for j \in \{1,2 \} are the four momenta of the pions, and indeed relativistic mass is only a confusing idea from the very early times of relativity. This was abandoned in 1908 by Minkowski in analyzing the mathematical structure of special relativity. Unfortunately the old concepts still survived some (even otherwise very good) textbooks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
457
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K