How Do You Calculate Velocity and Acceleration from a Position Function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating velocity and acceleration from a given position function, specifically s(t) = 1 - 3t². Participants are exploring how to differentiate the position function to find expressions for velocity and acceleration, as well as determining when the velocity equals zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to start the problem and questions whether to set v=0 equal to the position function. Some participants suggest differentiating the position function to find velocity and then setting it to zero to solve for time. Others inquire about the process of differentiation and its implications for understanding velocity and acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of differentiation and its application to motion. Some have provided guidance on the differentiation process, while others are still seeking clarity on the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration. There is a mix of understanding and confusion, with some participants reflecting on their previous learning experiences.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a textbook that lacks clarity on the topic, which may be contributing to the confusion among participants. Additionally, some participants reference prior coursework that covered related topics but did not delve into derivatives in the same detail.

fitz_calc
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



s is the position of a particle along the s-axis, find an expression for the velocity and acceleration and determine when v=0

s=1-3t^2

Homework Equations



v=ds/dt , a=dv/dt

The Attempt at a Solution



No idea where to begin, my book is not very clear. Do I just set v=0 equal to s = 1-3t^2? I know the answer is v=-6t but do not know where to begin - thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, differentiate s(t) as you have shown to find v(t). Then set v(t) = 0, and solve for t. You're on the right track.
 
I still do not know where to begin. my book gives an example s=2t^2-4t. when they begin to solve the problem they go from v=ds/dt to v=4t-4

i don't see how they come to this value?
 
They found the derivative of 2t^2 -4t.
 
so i found acceleration to be -6 by taking the derivative of -6t. what does this mean in layman's terms, exactly? I don't understand how taking the derivative of s yields the velocity, and taking the derivative of velocity yields acceleration...
 
fitz_calc said:
so i found acceleration to be -6 by taking the derivative of -6t. what does this mean in layman's terms, exactly? I don't understand how taking the derivative of s yields the velocity, and taking the derivative of velocity yields acceleration...

Velocity is the change in position per unit time, or ds/dt. Acceleration is the change in velocity per unit time, or dv/dt.

It's helpful to carry along your units...

** units of position s are meters [m]

** units of velocity v are meters per second [m/s]

** units of acceleration a are meters per second squared [m/s^2]

When you get an answer like a = -6 [m/s^2], that means that you have a *deceleration* of 6 [m/s^2]. Does that help?
 
Last edited:
fitz_calc said:
so i found acceleration to be -6 by taking the derivative of -6t. what does this mean in layman's terms, exactly? I don't understand how taking the derivative of s yields the velocity, and taking the derivative of velocity yields acceleration...
It means that this object has a constant downward acceleration, just a something falling in constant gravity does.

Surely you have learned that the derivative is the rate of change of a function relative to the variable? If x(t) is distance, x, as a function of time, t, then dx/dt is the rate of change of distance relative to time: precisely the instantaneous velocity. Of course, the second derivative then is the rate of change of velocity relative to time: the definition of acceleration.
 
i get it now, some of these topics were covered in my mechanics course last year, though we never really touched on derivatives like this technical calculus course is. thanks.
 
Oh, God, I hate courses like that. I once taught a "Calculus for Economics and Business Administration" course. The textbook I was required to use covered limits in one page just listing the three limit laws:
If \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= L_1 and \lim_{x\rightarrow a} g(x)= L_2 then \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)+ g(x)= L_1+ L_2.
If \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= L_1 and \lim_{x\rightarrow a} g(x)= L_2 then \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)g(x)= L_1L_2
If \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= L_1 and \lim_{x\rightarrow a} g(x)= L_2 AND L_1 is not 0, then \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)/g(x)= L_1/L_2.

On the very next page, they defined the derivative as
\frac{df}{dx}(a)= \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h}
not bothering to point out that the laws of limits they had given do not apply here because the denominator necessarily does go to 0!

They had left out the most important law of limits:
If f(x)= g(x) for all x except x=a, then \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x)= \lim_{x\rightarrow a}g(x)!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K