How Do You Compute Non-Integer Powers of Quantum Operators?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nicksauce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expected value Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of non-integer powers of quantum operators, particularly in the context of expected values in quantum mechanics. Participants explore various methods for handling operators raised to fractional powers, including the use of Fourier transforms, expansions in momentum eigenstates, and diagonalization techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest evaluating expected values using the expression <\psi|Q(x,-i\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial x})|\psi>, questioning how to compute .
  • One participant proposes expanding the state in momentum eigenstates as a potential solution.
  • Another participant mentions that, similar to angular momentum, one cannot take square roots of operators directly and suggests using \sqrt{ \langle p^3\rangle} instead.
  • Fourier transforming the wave function to the momentum representation is suggested as a way to treat p as a classical variable.
  • Participants introduce new problems involving and discuss the implications of calculating derivatives using Fourier transforms.
  • One participant mentions that for arbitrary functions like f(p,x)=\sqrt{x^2 + p^2}, a modification of the Fourier transform method could be applied, although it may not be the simplest approach.
  • A Taylor expansion is proposed as a method for handling certain operator calculations.
  • Diagonalizing the operator x^2 + p^2 is discussed, with references to harmonic oscillator eigenstates and the computation of averages using these states.
  • There is a suggestion that expanding in SHO states may or may not be easier than using a Taylor expansion, depending on the specific wave function and operator involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods and approaches to compute non-integer powers of quantum operators, but no consensus is reached on a singular method or solution. Multiple competing views and techniques remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the specific form of the wave function and operator, as well as unresolved mathematical steps in the proposed methods.

nicksauce
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
1,270
Reaction score
7
To find the expected value of Q(x,p) we evaluate [itex]<\psi|Q(x,-i\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial x})|\psi>[/itex]. But what do you do if you want to find, say, <p^(3/2)>. How do you raise the derivative operator to the three-halves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


nicksauce said:
To find the expected value of Q(x,p) we evaluate [itex]<\psi|Q(x,-i\hbar \frac{\partial }{\partial x})|\psi>[/itex]. But what do you do if you want to find, say, <p^(3/2)>. How do you raise the derivative operator to the three-halves?

Expand the state in momentum eigenstates.
 


You would make like you do for angular momentum. Since you can't take square roots of operator, you have to study the square of the quantity you are interested in. So in your case, you would have to settle for [tex]\sqrt{ \langle p^3\rangle}[/tex], but you would have to put absolute values somewhere.

...edit: go with count iblis' suggestion instead
 


Fourier transform the wave function to the momentum representation, getting
[tex]\phi(p)[/tex]. Then p is just like a c number.
 


Okay, thanks for the replies.
 


Next problem:

How would you handle:

<x^(1/2)p^(3/2)>
 


Count Iblis said:
Next problem:

How would you handle:

<x^(1/2)p^(3/2)>

Formally if f(x) is a nice function you could always calculate the n'th derivative using Fourier transforms, like

[tex] \frac{d^nf[x]}{dx^n}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dk(ik)^ne^{-ikx}<br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxf[x]e^{ikx}[/tex]

also when [tex]n=\sqrt{pi}/i^5.8[/tex], for example. So the <x^(1/2)p^(3/2)> involves a tripple integral.
 


Count Iblis said:
Next problem:

How would you handle:

<x^(1/2)p^(3/2)>
Fourier transform [tex]\psi(x)[/tex] and [tex]x^{1/2}\psi(x)[/tex] separately.
 


Ok, that was too easy for you two. :smile: Let me think of a more difficult problem. Well, why not just consider <f(x,p)> where f is some arbitrary function, like e.g.:


[tex]f(p,x)=\sqrt{x^2 + p^2}[/tex]

Now, you can just modify the Fourier transform method and write this too as a triple integral. However, that may not be the simplest way, particularly not in the case when f is given as above. :smile:
 
  • #10


For that you may need a Taylor expansion.
 
  • #11


Diagonalizing the operator x^2 + p^2 is easier. The eigenstates are the harmonic oscillator eigenstates, let's denote them by |n>. You can thus compute the average as:

<psi|sqrt(x^2 + P^2)|psi> =

sum over n of <psi|sqrt(x^2 + p^2)|n><n|psi>

sqrt(x^2 + p^2)|n> = sqrt[(n+1/2)C]

were C follows from the usual H.O. algebra (i'm too lazy to compute it right now) So, the average is:

sum over n of sqrt[(n+1/2)C] |<n|psi>|^2
 
  • #12


Expanding in SHO states may or may not be easier than Taylor expansion.
This would depend on the original wave function and operator.
SHO works for the particular operator x^2+p^2, but TE works for most operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
652
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
382
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K