MHB How Do You Compute Stable/Unstable Manifolds Using Taylor Approximation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fantini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds Stable
Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
Consider the system $$x' = -x,$$ $$y' = y + g(x),$$ where $g$ is a class $C^1$ function with $g(0) = 0$.

Compute the stable manifold $W^s (\mathbf{0}).$
Using $g(x) = x^n (n \geq 1)$, compute $W^s (\mathbf{0})$ and $W^u (\mathbf{0})$.

The other was an exercise I found, this is an actual exercise from the test. How would I compute the stable/unstable manifold using the Taylor approximation method or successive approximations? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Writing $g(x)$ as a power series,
$$y'= y+ ax+ bx^2+ cx^3.$$

From the first equation, $x'= -x$, we can see that $x$ decreases rapidly as the independent variable (which I will call $t$) increases (in fact, $x= Ce^{-t}$).

So for large $t$, this can be approximated by
$y'= y+ aCe^{-t}$. The general solution to the associated homogeneous equation is $y= De^{t}$. Looking for a specific solution of the form $y= Ae^{-t}$, $y'= -Ae^{-t}$ so the equation becomes $-Ae^{-t}= Ae^{-t}+ aCe^{-t}$. $-2Ae^{-t}= aCe^{-t}$, so $A= -aC/2$. The general solutions to the equations are $x= Ce^{-t}$ and $y= De^{t}-(aC/2)e^{-t}$. If $D$ is not $0$, $y$ will increase without bound so the stable manifold will be $x= Ce^{-t}$, $y= -(aC/2)e^{-t}$, which can be written $y/x= -(aC/2)e^{-t}/Ce^{-t}= -a/2$ so that $y= -(a/2)x$ or, equivalently, $ax+ 2y= 0$.

That is not the general method of finding the stable manifold but it works for this simple situation.
($a$ is the coefficient of $x$ in the linearization of $x$.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks HoI! What if I wanted a third order approximation? Something that perhaps yields a third degree polynomial. Would it proceed as $$y' = y + aCe^{-t} +bCe^{-2t} + cC e^{-3t},$$ followed by finding $y$ and expliciting it as a function of $x$?
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K