How do you define the limits for this triple integral?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around defining the limits for a triple integral over a specific region in three-dimensional space, characterized by the inequalities 1 <= x² + y² + z² <= 4 and z >= sqrt(x² + y²). Participants explore various coordinate systems, including polar and spherical coordinates, to determine appropriate limits for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests substituting z from the second inequality into the first, questioning the validity of this approach given the nature of the inequalities.
  • Another participant proposes using spherical coordinates to solve the problem and emphasizes the importance of visualizing the region described by the inequalities.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of the second inequality, particularly regarding the height relative to the radius.
  • A participant provides the spherical coordinate transformations and indicates that the first inequality corresponds to the range for r.
  • There is a discussion about determining the angle θ, with suggestions to analyze the surface described by z = sqrt(x² + y²) and to use trigonometric identities.
  • One participant attempts to clarify the relationship between sin(θ) and cos(θ) in the context of the inequalities, leading to further exploration of the range of θ.
  • Another participant notes that the inequality does not restrict the angle φ, allowing it to take all values between [0, 2π).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods for determining limits and the interpretation of the inequalities. There is no consensus on the best approach to take or the correctness of specific methods proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for careful consideration of the inequalities and the geometric interpretation of the region, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the limits for integration and the implications of the inequalities.

Inertigratus
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
I had this on a test today. First everything seemed easy, but then I got stuck.
So the body over which the integral is to be taken is defined by:
1 <= x2 + y2 + z2 <= 4
and
z >= sqrt(x2 + y2)

Right now as I'm typing this I just thought that, why not plug z from the second eq. into the first? is this possible, even though it's not an equality but greater than or equal?

That would make it: (1/2) <= x2 + y2 <= 2
Then: 1/sqrt(2) <= z <= sqrt(2)

Is this right? If so, what about the limits for x and y, can I just change to polar coordinates and let r = radius vary from 1 to 4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Inertigratus,

I would probably solve this problem by switching to spherical coordinates. Whenever you're trying to figure out the limits of integration, it's usually best to draw yourself a picture. What regions are described by [itex]1 \leq x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \leq 4[/itex] and [itex]z \geq \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/itex]?

I'm not sure your method for solving for z works... For one thing, when x = 0 = y, then [itex]z = \pm 2[/itex] on the outer boundary.
 
spamiam said:
Hi Inertigratus,

I would probably solve this problem by switching to spherical coordinates. Whenever you're trying to figure out the limits of integration, it's usually best to draw yourself a picture. What regions are described by [itex]1 \leq x^2 + y^2 + z^2 \leq 4[/itex] and [itex]z \geq \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/itex]?

I'm not sure your method for solving for z works... For one thing, when x = 0 = y, then [itex]z = \pm 2[/itex] on the outer boundary.

That is what I'm a little unsure of. The first inequality states that the region is between the two spheres with radius 1 and 2. The other inequality states that the height is greater than the radius... but, the radius of what?
There are two spheres with different radius...
I'm having trouble understanding the second inequality.
 
In spherical coordinates,

[tex]x = r\cos \phi \sin \theta,~y = r\sin \phi \sin \theta,~z = r\cos \theta[/tex]

so the first inequality corresponds to [itex]1 < r < 2[/itex], as you said. If you plug the above relations into the second inequality, you should be able to figure out the range for the angles.
 
sin(θ) = cos(θ) ?
 
If I substitute z and x, y in the second inequality that's what I get. Any idea on how to get the angle?
I'm not too good at trig...
 
Two ways you can figure out theta:

1) What kind of surface is described by [itex]z = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/itex]? Also if you plug in x=0 or y=0, you get the projection on the yz- or xz-plane, respectively, which will allow you to figure out the angle.

2) [itex]\sin\theta = \cos\theta[/itex] is equivalent to [itex]\tan\theta = 1[/itex]. So draw yourself a right triangle with legs of equal length, and then find the measure of the angle.
 
Last edited:
Inertigratus said:
sin(θ) = cos(θ) ?

Almost. Just to be clear that you're doing all the steps: Remember that you have an inequality, [itex]z \geq \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}[/itex]. If you plug in the spherical coordinate relations, you get [itex]r\cos\theta \geq \sqrt{r^2\cos^2\phi\sin^2\theta + r^2\sin^2\phi\sin^2\theta}[/itex], which after some simpificatin yields

[tex]\cos\theta \geq \sin \theta.[/tex]

So, your task is to find the range of [itex]\theta[/itex] for which this is true, knowing that the range of [itex]\theta[/itex] is restricted to [itex][0,\pi][/itex]. If you plot both cos and sin on the same plot, you can see that this is true starting at 0 all the way to the value of theta which makes the above inequality an equality. As spamiam pointed out, [itex]\cos\theta = \sin\theta[/itex] is equivalent to [itex]1 = \tan\theta[/itex].

Also, note that this didn't put any restriction on the angle [itex]\phi[/itex], so it can take all values between [itex][0,2\pi)[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K