How do you derive Stefan-Boltzmann and Wien's laws from Wien's distribution function?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 5K views
O_o
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I'm supposed to prove that Wien's Law: [tex]P(\lambda,T) = \frac{f(\lambda T)}{\lambda^5}[/tex] includes Stefan-Botlzmann's Law [tex]R(T) = \sigma T^4[/tex] and Wien's Displacement Law: [tex]\lambda_{max} T = b[/tex]

For Wien's Displacement Law:

I know that I would have to find when [tex]P(\lambda ,T)[/tex] graphed against [tex]\lambda[/tex] has a slope of 0. So I think I need to find the derivative with respect to [tex]\lambda[/tex]. But the only two equations for [tex]P(\lambda,T)[/tex] I have are [tex]P(\lambda,T) = \frac{f(\lambda T)}{\lambda^5}[/tex] and [tex]P(\lambda,T) = \frac{8\pi kT}{\lambda^4}[/tex]

So if I take the derivative of [tex]P(\lambda,T) = \frac{8\pi kT}{\lambda^4}[/tex] with respect to [tex]\lambda[/tex] I have
[tex]8\pi kT} * (-4) * \lambda^{-5} = 0[/tex] Where I'm guessing that everything except [tex]\lambda[/tex] is being held constant and I don't know what to do from there.

Any hints or corrections of things I said would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to start with Planck's equation, which may be part of the f() function, above. I don't think your expression for P in terms of T and lambda is correct (although it might represent Wien's guess). That function has no peak - it gives an "ultraviolet catastrophe" as lambda goes to zero - there is no lambda_max.