How Do You Derive the Lorentz Transformation for Frame S''?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
brainpushups
Messages
457
Reaction score
195

Homework Statement



Frame S' travels at speed V1 along the x-axis of frame S. Frame S'' travels at speed V2 along the x' axis of frame S'. Apply the Lorentz transformation twice to find the coordinates x'', y'', etc of any event in terms of x, y, z, t. Show that this is the same as the standard Lorentz transformation with velocity V given by the relativistic sum of V1 and V2



Homework Equations



[itex]\x'=\gamma(x-Vt)[/itex]
[itex]\t'=\gamma(t'-\frac{Vx}{c^{2}})[/itex]
[itex]\v_{x}'=\frac{v_{x}-V}{1-\frac{v_{x}V}{c^{2}}}[/itex]



The Attempt at a Solution




No problem with the first part. I'll just put my answer for the x'' coordinate for reference:

[itex]\x''=\gamma_{1}\gamma_{2}(x(1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}})-(V_{1}+V_{2})t)[/itex]

The different gamma factors come from transforming between S and S' and then again between S' and S''

For showing that this is equivalent to applying the Lorentz transformation using the relativistic sum:

[itex]\x''=\gamma(x-Vt)=\gamma(x-\frac{V_{1}+V_{2}}{1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}}}t)[/itex]

This is almost in the correct form. If I kill the fraction I can get

[itex]\x''(1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}})=\gamma(x(1+\frac{V_{1}V_{2}}{c^{2}})-(V_{1}+V_{2})t)[/itex]

The only differences between this and the expression I am looking for is the extra factor by x'' and the fact that the factor gamma should be the product of two gamma factors. I figured I could write the gammas explicitly in terms of V1 and V2 in my first equation for x’’ and then do the same in the second equation by substituting the relativistic sum for V and then rearrange things until I got the extra factor next to x’’ in the second equation to cancel. I worked through the algebra for a little while, but it didn't seem like it was going to happen. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I continue with the algebraic gymnastics. If I’m on the right track please confirm and I’ll continue to work at it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you figured out the issue with gamma? I am also very confused about this question.
 
TSny said:
Everything looks OK. I would suggest that you now try to simplify ##\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}}## where V is the relativistic sum of V1 and V2.
I cannot get it. I try to calculate
γ1γ2 with V1 = V2 = 0.8c and its relativistic speed.
It found that the equation could not hold.
 
xiaozegu said:
I cannot get it. I try to calculate
γ1γ2 with V1 = V2 = 0.8c and its relativistic speed.
It found that the equation could not hold.

Everything should work out. I'm not sure exactly what you have done. Can you show us the details of your work?
 
brainpushups said:
I worked through the algebra for a little while, but it didn't seem like it was going to happen. I just want to make sure I'm not overlooking something before I continue with the algebraic gymnastics. If I’m on the right track please confirm and I’ll continue to work at it.

It is just algebraic gymnastics. However, I'd suggest just working on the γ factor for the combined velocities first. And, perhaps, working on ##\frac{1}{\gamma ^2}## makes it slightly easier.