How Do You Derive the Propagator for the Proca Action?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the propagator for the Proca action, represented by the equation S[A_\mu] = ∫ d^4x [-1/4 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + 1/2 m^2 A_\mu A^\mu]. The key equation derived is [(-k^2 + m^2) g^{\mu\nu} + k^\mu k^\nu] \tilde D_{\nu\lambda}(k) = δ^\mu_\lambda, which leads to the relationship k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\lambda} = k_\lambda. The final expression for the propagator is k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\lambda} = k_\lambda/m^2. The discussion highlights the importance of substituting identities and contracting with the metric for clarity in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Proca action and vector fields
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of the anti-symmetric electromagnetic field tensor F_{\mu\nu}
  • Ability to manipulate tensor equations and contractions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the propagator in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the implications of the Proca action in particle physics
  • Explore the role of the metric tensor in tensor calculus
  • Review Zee's Quantum Field Theory textbook for additional insights
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on quantum field theory and the dynamics of vector fields.

CompuChip
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
49
Hi all,
I'm stuck with this following problem:

Homework Statement


Consider the Proca action,
S[A_\mu] = \int \, \mathrm d^4x \left[ - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + \frac12 m^2 A_\mu A^\mu \right]
where F_{\mu\nu} = 2 \partial_{[\mu} A_{\nu]} is the anti-symmetric electromagnetic
field tensor.

Derive the propagator for the vector field A_\mu.

Homework Equations



I did a Fourier transform to get
\left[ (- k^2 + m^2) g^{\mu\nu} + k^\mu k^\nu \right] \tilde D_{\nu\lambda}(k) = \delta^\mu_\lambda. (*)

Zee's book on QFT gives the result on page 13, as if it were trivial, but I can't do the calculation (satisfactorily).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to follow the hint in the question: "the calculation involves deriving an identity for k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\mu}".
I contracted (*) with k_\mu which got me
k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\lambda} = k_\lambda
or (contracting with k^\lambda)
k^\lambda k^\nu D_{\nu\lambda} = k^2
but I still didn't really see how to solve for \tilde D_{\nu\lambda}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95
Physics news on Phys.org
I get

k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\lambda} = \frac{k_\lambda}{m^2},

and then I think everything works out okay.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95
Thanks, I'll check that calculation.
My problem was how to extract the propagator from that contraction, though.

Anyway, let me get some sleep now, as it's 1:30 :smile:
 
CompuChip said:
Thanks, I'll check that calculation.
My problem was how to extract the propagator from that contraction, though.

Anyway, let me get some sleep now, as it's 1:30 :smile:

Substitute the identity and then contract with the metric.
 
I checked my earlier calculation and the 1/m^2 missing was just a typo.
Also, I see what you mean now and it turns out to be quite easy indeed.

Thank you very much George!
 
I am having the same problem.

Could you elaborate on what you mean by substituting the identity?

Edit: scratch that. I figured it out.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K