How Do You Derive the Propagator for the Proca Action?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the propagator for the Proca action, which describes a massive vector field. The original poster presents the Proca action and the corresponding equations, expressing difficulty in completing the derivation of the propagator for the vector field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Fourier transforms and the implications of contracting equations to derive the propagator. Questions arise regarding the extraction of the propagator from the derived identities and the steps involved in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants are actively working through the calculations and sharing insights, while others express confusion about specific steps. There is a recognition of progress, with one participant indicating they have resolved their confusion. However, no consensus or final solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of typos affecting calculations and the need for clarity on substituting identities in the context of the problem. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to navigate the complexities of the derivation.

CompuChip
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
49
Hi all,
I'm stuck with this following problem:

Homework Statement


Consider the Proca action,
S[A_\mu] = \int \, \mathrm d^4x \left[ - \frac14 F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + \frac12 m^2 A_\mu A^\mu \right]
where F_{\mu\nu} = 2 \partial_{[\mu} A_{\nu]} is the anti-symmetric electromagnetic
field tensor.

Derive the propagator for the vector field A_\mu.

Homework Equations



I did a Fourier transform to get
\left[ (- k^2 + m^2) g^{\mu\nu} + k^\mu k^\nu \right] \tilde D_{\nu\lambda}(k) = \delta^\mu_\lambda. (*)

Zee's book on QFT gives the result on page 13, as if it were trivial, but I can't do the calculation (satisfactorily).

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to follow the hint in the question: "the calculation involves deriving an identity for k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\mu}".
I contracted (*) with k_\mu which got me
k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\lambda} = k_\lambda
or (contracting with k^\lambda)
k^\lambda k^\nu D_{\nu\lambda} = k^2
but I still didn't really see how to solve for \tilde D_{\nu\lambda}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95
Physics news on Phys.org
I get

k^\nu \tilde D_{\nu\lambda} = \frac{k_\lambda}{m^2},

and then I think everything works out okay.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phoenix95
Thanks, I'll check that calculation.
My problem was how to extract the propagator from that contraction, though.

Anyway, let me get some sleep now, as it's 1:30 :smile:
 
CompuChip said:
Thanks, I'll check that calculation.
My problem was how to extract the propagator from that contraction, though.

Anyway, let me get some sleep now, as it's 1:30 :smile:

Substitute the identity and then contract with the metric.
 
I checked my earlier calculation and the 1/m^2 missing was just a typo.
Also, I see what you mean now and it turns out to be quite easy indeed.

Thank you very much George!
 
I am having the same problem.

Could you elaborate on what you mean by substituting the identity?

Edit: scratch that. I figured it out.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K