How Do You Derive the Time-Averaged Energy Density from Jackson's Formulation?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
schrodingerscat11
Messages
86
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Given the energy density expression from Jackson
[itex]\frac{1}{2}\big(\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{H}\cdot\mathbf{B}\big)[/itex] (Eq. 6.106)

Show the missing steps to arrive at the time-averaged energy density
[itex]\frac{1}{4}\big(\epsilon\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{E}^*+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{B}^*\big)[/itex] (Eq. 7.13)

Homework Equations


See problem above.
[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{1}{T}\int_0^Tu(t) dt[/itex] (time-averaged quantity)

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{1}{T}\int_0^Tu(t) dt[/itex]
[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \frac{1}{2}\big(\mathbf{E}\cdot\mathbf{D}+\mathbf{H}\cdot\mathbf{B}\big) dt[/itex]
[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \frac{1}{2}\big(\mathbf{E}\cdot\epsilon\mathbf{E}+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathbf{B}\cdot\mathbf{B}\big) dt[/itex]

[itex]\mathbf{E}=\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}[/itex]
[itex]\mathbf{B}=\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}[/itex]

[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{1}{T}\int_0^T \frac{1}{2}\big(\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\cdot\epsilon\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\cdot\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\big) dt[/itex]

[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}\int_0^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} \frac{1}{2}\big(\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\cdot\epsilon\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\cdot\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\big) dt[/itex]

[itex]T=\frac{2\pi}{\omega}[/itex]

[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}\int_0^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} \frac{1}{2}\big(\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\cdot\epsilon\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\cdot\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}-i\omega t}\big) dt[/itex]

[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}\int_0^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} \frac{1}{2}\big(e^{-2i\omega t}\big)\big(\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\cdot\epsilon\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\cdot\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\big) dt[/itex]

Let [itex]A=\big(\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\cdot\epsilon\mathcal{E}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}+\frac{1}{\mu}\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\cdot\mathcal{B}e^{ik\mathbf{\hat{n}}\cdot\mathbf{x}}\big)[/itex]

[itex]\langle u \rangle_t=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}\int_0^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}} \frac{1}{2}\big(e^{-2i\omega t}\big)A~dt[/itex]

Question: Is the integral [itex]\int_0^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}}e^{2i\omega t} dt[/itex] equal to zero?
I get 1 -1 = 0, but then I cannot prove what I'm proving with this number. :(

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physicsjn said:
Question: Is the integral [itex]\int_0^{\frac{2\pi}{\omega}}e^{2i\omega t} dt[/itex] equal to zero?
I get 1 -1 = 0, but then I cannot prove what I'm proving with this number. :(
Yes it is (apart from a prefactor, it is equivalent to ##\int_0^{2\pi} e^{i t} dt##)

Your expression for E should be real as there are no complex electric fields. If you take the calculate E everywhere, this problem will disappear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schrodingerscat11
Actually, since it was due today, I kinda followed a solution in Wikipedia for Poynting vector (attached is the screenshot of Wikipedia solution. But I replaced the expression with the one used for energy density. In my new solution, the integral above was indeed zero, but there were new trems created by all the crossmultiplying done.I am not sure though if I did it right. But I did managed to arrive at the final expression. But thanks anyways. :)