MHB How Do You Determine the Direction for a Specific Directional Derivative Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Joe20
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Find the directions in which the directional derivative of f(x,y) = x^2+ xy^3 at the point (2,1) has the value of 2.

What I have done so far which I am not sure how to continue:

partial derivative of fx = 2x + y^3 and fy = 3xy^2

gradient vector, <fx,fy> at (2,1) = <5,6>

Let u = <a,b>

Directional derivative at (2,1) = gradient vector at (2,1) . u => <5,6> . <a, b> = 5a+6b = 2

Hope someone can advise. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alexis87 said:
Find the directions in which the directional derivative of f(x,y) = x^2+ xy^3 at the point (2,1) has the value of 2.

What I have done so far which I am not sure how to continue:

partial derivative of fx = 2x + y^3 and fy = 3xy^2

gradient vector, <fx,fy> at (2,1) = <5,6>

Let u = <a,b>

Directional derivative at (2,1) = gradient vector at (2,1) . u => <5,6> . <a, b> = 5a+6b = 2

Hope someone can advise. Thanks.
Instead of taking $\mathbf{u} = \langle a,b\rangle$, it might be better to take $\mathbf{u} = \langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta\rangle$, so that $\mathbf{u}$ is a unit vector making an angle $\theta$ with the $x$-axis. The equation then becomes $5\cos\theta + 6\sin\theta = 2.$ Do you know how to solve that sort of trigonometric equation?
 
Opalg said:
Instead of taking $\mathbf{u} = \langle a,b\rangle$, it might be better to take $\mathbf{u} = \langle \cos\theta,\sin\theta\rangle$, so that $\mathbf{u}$ is a unit vector making an angle $\theta$ with the $x$-axis. The equation then becomes $5\cos\theta + 6\sin\theta = 2.$ Do you know how to solve that sort of trigonometric equation?
May I ask why are we using cosine teta and sine teta? Yes , using R-formulae to solve for the teta.
 
Alexis87 said:
May I ask why are we using cosine teta and sine teta? Yes , using R-formulae to solve for the teta.
Opalg told you that: u is a unit vector making an angle θ with the x-axis. The problem asked for the direction and giving that angle is a good way to designate the x- direction.

The only difficulty with your method is that there are an infinite number of vectors pointing in a given direction, all with different lengths. When you took such a vector to be <a, b> you arrived at the equation 5a+ 6b= 2, a single equation in two variables. Given different values for a, b, satisfying that equation you get different vectors, of different lengths, all pointing in the same direction. If you want a single vector as answer, you have to impose some other condition. If you require that the vector be of unit length, that a^2+ b^2= 1, then you will have two equations in a and b and will get opalg's answer. But you could also simply require that a, the x-component of the vector be equal to -2 and have the equation 5(-2)+ 6b= -10+ 6b= 2 and have 6b= 10= 2= 12 so b= 2. The vector <-2, 2> is a vector in the correct direction.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top