How Do You Find the Center of Mass of a Parabolic Plate?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the center of mass of a uniform parabolic plate defined by the equation y = 1.600x², with a height of 0.720 m. Participants are exploring the implications of uniform density and surface density in the context of this problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the symmetry of the problem and the need to divide the plate into horizontal strips for integration. There are inquiries about setting up the integral for calculating the center of mass, with some expressing confusion about the integration process and limits.

Discussion Status

Several participants have attempted to set up integrals for calculating the center of mass but have encountered difficulties. Some guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the integrals, and there is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to take, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the type of assistance they can receive. There are indications of varying levels of understanding regarding the integration setup and the definitions involved in calculating the center of mass.

hbomb
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm having a hard time with these center of mass problems. The lecture that my professor gave on this wasn't very descriptive. Could someone show me the whole process of finding the center of mass?

A uniform plate of height 0.720 m is cut in the form of a parabolic section.
http://img174.imageshack.us/my.php?image=prob03para2cz9.gif
The lower boundary of the plate is defined by: y=1.600x2. Find the distance from the rounded tip of the plate to the center of mass.
The fact that it is uniform means that it has the same density throughout. Since it is two-dimensional, it is a surface density, mass divided by area.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hbomb said:
I'm having a hard time with these center of mass problems. The lecture that my professor gave on this wasn't very descriptive. Could someone show me the whole process of finding the center of mass?

A uniform plate of height 0.720 m is cut in the form of a parabolic section.
http://img174.imageshack.us/my.php?image=prob03para2cz9.gif
The lower boundary of the plate is defined by: y=1.600x2. Find the distance from the rounded tip of the plate to the center of mass.
The fact that it is uniform means that it has the same density throughout. Since it is two-dimensional, it is a surface density, mass divided by area.
By symmetry you know the x-coordinate of the CM, right? For the yCM coordinate, you need to divide the plate into pieces that have the same y coordinate. Those would be horizontal strips having area dA = 2x(y)dy where x(y) is the x value at the edge of the plate corresponding to the value y. The mass of such a strip would be dm = σdA where σ is the area density of the plate. yCM is the value obtained by integrating ydm for y ranging from the bottom to the top of the plate and dividing that result by the total mass of the plate.
 
Could you set up the integral for me because I still don't understand.
 
hbomb said:
Could you set up the integral for me because I still don't understand.

Look up the definition of the center of mass, and you'll know how to set up the integral.
 
hbomb said:
Could you set up the integral for me because I still don't understand.
I could, but it will be better for you to give it a try yourself. I will tell you that from

y = 1.600x^2

it follows that

x(y) = sqrt(y/1.600)

The limits of integration over y are from 0 to the maximum height of .720 m.
 
Tha't what I did before and it didn't work for me. I got .527046y^(3/2).
I plugged in .72 to evaulate it and my homework site said it's wrong.
 
hbomb said:
Tha't what I did before and it didn't work for me. I got .527046y^(3/2).
I plugged in .72 to evaulate it and my homework site said it's wrong.
I have not seen your work, so I do not know how you arrived at that expression. It is not correct. You should have two integrals to evaluate. One for the integral of ydm and one for the integral of just dm the find the mass. When you take the ratio of the two, constants like σ and sqrt(1.600) divide out leaving you with a simple ratio of two integrals

yCM = [Int(y^(3/2)dy]/[Int(y^(1/2)dy]

where the limits of integration on both integrals are from 0 to .72 m

See if you can set up the problem and reduce it to that equation before doing the integrals, then evaluate.
 
Last edited:
That's what I don't understand, I don't know how to use the integration setup properly. This is what I should be using:

R=1/M*integral of rp(r)dV
 
hbomb said:
That's what I don't understand, I don't know how to use the integration setup properly. This is what I should be using:

R=1/M*integral of rp(r)dV
ρ is constant throughout the plate. So for this problem it can be takenout of the integral. Let Int[] be "the integral of"

R=ρ/M*Int[rdV]

R and r are vectors in this equation. The equality holds for each component. So you actually have three equations

X=ρ/M*Int[xdV]
Y=ρ/M*Int[ydV]
Z=ρ/M*Int[zdV]

In all of these the mass is found by integrating over the volume of the plate

M=ρ*Int[dV]=ρ*Int[dxdydz]

Since there are no functions of position in the integrand, the integral is partially separable. The limits of the z integral are independent of x and y coordinates so we can write

M=ρ*Int[dxdydz]=ρ*Int[dz]*Int[dxdy]

The origin is at the vertex of the plate and let's say it is in the middle of the thickness of the plate, which I will call T. The z integral is easy; it is the thickness of the plate.

M=ρ*T*Int[dxdy]

It is customary to define the product ρ*T to be the surface mass density σ, so this becomes

M=σ*Int[dxdy]

It is in fact so easy to do the z-integral that when approaching a problem for a uniform plate it is customary to sart with this expression instead of the integral over volume.

The limits of integration for one of the remaining integrals is a function of the other variable, so these cannot be separated. Either integral can be done first as long as the limits are handled correctly. Let me use Int[<L,U>ƒ(ξ)dξ] to show the limits, where L is lower, U is upper, and ξ is whatever the integration variable is. Then

M=σ*Int[<0,H>Int[<-w(y),+w(y)>dx]dy]

where w(y) is found by solving the boundary equation of the parabola that was given and H is the given height of the parabola. Doing the x integral gives

M=σ*Int[<0,H>2w(y)dy]

From y = 1.600*x^2 we get w(y) = sqrt(y/1.600). So

M=(2σ/sqrt1.600)*Int[<0,H>sqrt(y)dy]

Now you can follow the exact procedure I used here for the three remaining integrals to find X, Y, and Z. Or you can simplify things by taking advantage of symmetry. The plate is a mirror image of itself in the z-y plane. So Z must lie in the x-y plane. Hence Z = 0. The plate is a mirror image of itself in the y-z plane. Hence X = 0. That just leaves X. You should be able to follow what I did for M to set up the integral for X. When you do, the division by M will cancel some constants and you will be left with a ratio of two integrals.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
9K