How Do You Handle the Negative Gain When Calculating Resistance?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Calculate ##R_S## given the expression:

$$A_v = - \frac{g_m (R_L || R_D)}{1 + g_m R_S}$$

The parameters ##g_m = 1.292 \frac{mA}{V}##, ##R_L = 180 k \Omega##, ##R_D = 18 k \Omega##, ##A_v = 5 \frac{V}{V}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is about the negative sign. When I go to compute ##R_S##, do I pretend the negative sign isn't there or something? If I leave the negative sign in the calculation I get:

##R_S = - 4.05 k \Omega##

Resistances must be positive, so the above does not make physical sense.

If I pretend the negative sign isn't there then I get:

##R_S = 2.5 k \Omega##

What is the proper way to compute the resistance?

EDIT: I believe the gain should be ##A_v = -5 V/V## even though it was given as 5, so the resistance ##R_S = 2.5 k \Omega## should be correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is for a common-source amplifier with source resistance ##R_S##? If so, then you're right about ##A_v##.
 
Zondrina said:

Homework Statement



Calculate ##R_S## given the expression:

$$A_v = - \frac{g_m (R_L || R_D)}{1 + g_m R_S}$$

The parameters ##g_m = 1.292 \frac{mA}{V}##, ##R_L = 180 k \Omega##, ##R_D = 18 k \Omega##, ##A_v = 5 \frac{V}{V}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is about the negative sign. When I go to compute ##R_S##, do I pretend the negative sign isn't there or something? If I leave the negative sign in the calculation I get:

##R_S = - 4.05 k \Omega##

Resistances must be positive, so the above does not make physical sense.

If I pretend the negative sign isn't there then I get:

##R_S = 2.5 k \Omega##

What is the proper way to compute the resistance?

EDIT: I believe the gain should be ##A_v = -5 V/V## even though it was given as 5, so the resistance ##R_S = 2.5 k \Omega## should be correct.
Generalizing post 2 a bit, I'd venture that the circuit is an inverting stage of some kind, be it MOSFET, JFET, BJT, vacuum tube, etc. - based.
 
rude man said:
Generalizing post 2 a bit, I'd venture that the circuit is an inverting stage of some kind, be it MOSFET, JFET, BJT, vacuum tube, etc. - based.
I just guessed it was FET-based from the subscripts, i.e. D, S, L for drain, source, load.