How do you integrate the Hopf term in 2+1 dimensions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ian Lovejoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integration of the Hopf term in 2+1 dimensions, as discussed in the context of A. Zee's "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell," involves integrating out the gauge field in a Lagrangian with a Chern-Simons term. The Hopf term is defined as L_{Hopf}=\frac{1}{4\gamma}j_\mu(\frac{\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda}\partial_\nu}{\partial^2})j_\lambda. The integration process requires careful handling of the currents, specifically noting that the derivatives must act on the right-hand current. A common approach involves using the integral form of 1/{\partial^2}, but many users report difficulties in obtaining a non-zero result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory concepts, particularly Chern-Simons theory.
  • Familiarity with the mathematical formulation of the Hopf term.
  • Proficiency in performing integrals in three-dimensional momentum space.
  • Knowledge of the properties of the epsilon tensor and its implications in field theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration techniques for gauge fields in Quantum Field Theory.
  • Explore the implications of fractional statistics in particle systems.
  • Review the document referenced (http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/9501/9501022v2.pdf) for additional insights on the Hopf term.
  • Learn about the role of currents in Lagrangian formulations and their integration in field theories.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in Quantum Field Theory, theoretical physicists working on particle statistics, and graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of gauge theories and Chern-Simons terms.

Ian Lovejoy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell by A. Zee, which is excellent but it is occasionally difficult to fill in the blanks on one's own.

Once such place is the integration of the Hopf term, which results from integrating out the gauge field in a Lagrangian with a Chern-Simons term in 2+1 dimensional spacetime.

The Hopf term is:

[tex]L_{Hopf}=\frac{1}{4\gamma}j_\mu(\frac{\epsilon^{\mu\nu\lambda}\partial_\nu}{\partial^2})j_\lambda[/tex]

From here we are supposed to be able to define a current j representing one particle at rest at the origin while another particle goes halfway around it. Integrating the above with this current we are supposed to obtain [tex]1/4\gamma[/tex]. This defines the fractional statistics of the particles in the system.

Except for a factor of 2 the same treatment appears in section II of this document:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/cond-mat/pdf/9501/9501022v2.pdf

It all seems perfectly straightforward but I'm unable to do the integration. For [tex]1/{\partial^2}[/tex] I am using:

[tex]\int{\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{-e^{ik(x - y)}}{k^2 + i\epsilon}}[/tex]

No matter what order I do the integration in, I seem to get either an integral that is impossible to do, or an result that is apparently zero. The book and the above reference seem to imply that the result is easily obtained by plugging in the current into the Lagrangian.

Can anyone give me a hint? It would be much appreciated.

Thanks,
Ian
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First point to be noted: You cannot interchange the two currents. If you could, by antisymmetry of the epsilon tensor, the expression is identically zero.

The way the above makes sense is if the derivatives act on the right hand current.

Now, for a static charge the only nonzero component of the current is the zeroth component.
For one that is moving, something else, say the x or the y component is also nonzero.

Moving halfway around: say it moves on two consecutive sides of a square - first along the x and then along the y direction...

does this help?
 
I'm also stuck on this question, simply can't integrate out a closed form. Anyone succeeded doing it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K