How Do You Prove Electromagnetic Field Quantization?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical expression related to electromagnetic field quantization, specifically involving the integral of the electromagnetic field tensor and its relationship to the vector potential. The subject area is advanced theoretical physics, focusing on electromagnetism and field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the manipulation of terms in the integral, questioning the placement of factors of the vector potential and the presence of overall signs. There are discussions on the correctness of index raising and lowering, as well as the application of integration by parts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's derivations and questioning specific steps. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration by parts technique and the handling of indices, but there is no clear consensus on the correctness of the derivations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made in their derivations, particularly regarding the treatment of dummy indices and the implications of sign errors. There are references to using specific texts as guides, indicating a reliance on established literature for clarification.

  • #31
This:
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1379452078.975363.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
That doesn't really explain what you're thinking. What you're doing is like taking x(ay+bx) and saying it's equal to x(a+b)y. You're just replacing one variable by another for no apparent reason.
 
  • #33
Hmm... I figured I could rearrange and use the results of integration by parts to achieve the rearrangement that I did.. But I guess what I did was wrong...
 
  • #34
I'm thinking I might need to permute the indices and do some more raising and lowering?

\frac{1}{2}\int\partial^{4}x(-A_{v}\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}+A_{\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu})


\frac{1}{2}\int\partial^{4}x(A_{v}\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-A_{\nu}\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu})


\frac{1}{2}\int\partial^{4}xA_{\nu}(\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu})


\frac{1}{2}\int\partial^{4}xA_{\nu}(\square n_{\mu\nu}-\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\nu})A^{\mu}<br />
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Do you understand why what you did was wrong? Do you see that ##A_\nu \partial_\mu \partial^\mu A^\nu## and ##A_\nu \partial_\mu \partial^\mu A^\mu## aren't equal to each other? You've now made this same mistake several times, so it seems like you're just pushing symbols around without any understanding.
 
  • #36
I see what I did was wrong, and I can see that I have made the mistake several times. I guess I just don't spot it, but I am not at all confident with this...I had another go in the penultimate post, but I don't think the way I've permuted indices is correct..
 
  • #37
smallgirl said:
\frac{1}{2}\int\partial^{4}xA_{\nu}(\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}A^{\nu}-\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu})
\frac{1}{2}\int\partial^{4}xA_{\nu}(\square n_{\mu\nu}-\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\nu})A^{\mu}<br />
That's pretty close. Start with the first integral and do it one step at a time.
  1. First, replace ##\partial_\mu\partial^\mu## with ##\Box##.
  2. Then raise the index on ##A_\nu##. When you do that, you have to lower ##\nu## on the other terms.
  3. Next, replace ##A_\nu## (it should only appear once at this point) with ##A_\nu = \eta_{\mu\nu} A^\mu##.
  4. Now you should have ##A^\mu## on the right on both terms, so you can pull it out to the right.
At this point, you should have
$$\frac{1}{2}\int d^4x\,A^\nu(\Box \eta_{\mu\nu}-\partial_\mu\partial_\nu) A^\mu$$ Now if you want to, you can relabel ##\mu \leftrightarrow \nu## so that it'll match up exactly with the expression from the homework assignment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K