Field in the presence of a background electromagnetic field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation in the presence of a background electromagnetic field using Dirac notation. The participants analyze the equation involving gamma matrices, covariant derivatives, and electromagnetic potentials, specifically addressing the term modifications introduced by the electromagnetic field. Key equations include the rearrangement of terms leading to the Klein-Gordon equation and the identification of additional terms resulting from the electromagnetic interaction. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in incorporating identity elements and commutation relations within the framework of quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with Dirac matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of covariant derivatives in the context of gauge theories
  • Basic grasp of the Klein-Gordon equation and its significance
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein-Gordon equation in electromagnetic fields
  • Explore the properties of gamma matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about covariant derivatives and their role in gauge theories
  • Investigate the implications of commutation relations in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers focusing on quantum field theory and electromagnetic interactions.

Wledig
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A field obeying the Dirac equation in the presence of a background electromagnetic field also obeys the second-order equation:$$(i\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}+m)(i\gamma^{\nu}D_{\nu}-m)\Psi = 0$$ Where ##D_{\mu} = (\partial_{\mu} +ieA_{\mu})## Simplify this equation by using the identity $$\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu} = \dfrac{1}{2}\{\gamma^{\mu},\gamma^{\nu}\} + \dfrac{1}{2}[\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}]$$
a) Show that it reduces to the Klein-Gordon equation plus one extra term.

b) Simplify the new term by proving the identity $$[D_{\mu},D_{\nu}] = +ieF_{\mu \nu}$$ . Using the explicit form of the ##\gamma^{\mu}## matrices evaluate this term in a background magnetic field for which ##F_ij = \epsilon_{ijk}B^k## and ##F_{0i} = 0##.

c) Act the resulting equation on ##\Psi = \begin{pmatrix}
\xi \\
0
\end{pmatrix}
e^{-imt}##. Show that to first order in B, the energy of the state is shifted by an term of the form of ##\Delta E = \mu \cdot B##. In the expression for ##\mu##, identify g = 2.
Relevant Equations
Klein Gordon equation: ##(\partial^2 + m^2)\phi(x) = 0##

Dirac equation solution he is referring to:
##\Psi = \begin{pmatrix}
\xi \\
0
\end{pmatrix}
e^{-imt}##

Magnetic moment: ##\mu = \dfrac{-geS}{2m}##
Attempt at a solution:

$$ -\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}D_{\mu} D_{\nu} - im\gamma^{\mu} D_{\mu} + im\gamma^{\nu}D_{\nu} - m^2 =$$
$$ -\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}(\partial_{\mu} + ieA_{\mu})(\partial_{\nu}-m) - I am \gamma^{\mu}(\partial_{\mu}+ieA_{\mu})+im\gamma^{\nu}(\partial_{\nu}+ieA_{\nu}) - m^2 =$$
$$ \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}(\partial_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} - \partial_{\mu} m + ieA_{\mu} \partial_{\nu} - ieA_{\mu} m) - im\gamma^{\mu} \partial_{\mu} + emA_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} + im\gamma^{\nu}\partial_{\nu}-em\gamma^{\nu} A_{\nu} - m^2$$

Rearranging the terms we can recover the Klein-Gordon equation with this additional term c:
$$ -\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}\partial_\mu \partial_nu + im\gamma^{\nu}\partial_\nu - im\gamma^{\mu}\partial_\mu - m^2 + c$$
$$ -\eta^{\mu \nu} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu - m^2 + c$$
$$ c = \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}ieA_{\mu}\partial_{\nu} + \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}iemA_{\mu} + eA_{\mu}\gamma^{\mu} - m\gamma^{\nu}eA_{\nu}$$

I don't see a way to incorporate the identity he suggested and still recover the Klein Gordon equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just noticed a bunch of typos at my attempted solution, I apologize for that. Here's my new attempt, if we focus on the first term:
$$-\gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu D_\mu D_\nu =
-\dfrac{1}{2}( \{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu \} + [\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu]) D_\mu D_\nu =$$
$$-\dfrac{1}{2}(2\eta^{\mu \nu} + [\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu]) D_\mu D_\nu =$$

$$\underline{-\eta^{\mu \nu}}(\underline{\partial_\mu \partial_\nu} + \partial_\mu i e A_\nu + ieA_\mu \partial_\nu - eA_\mu A_\nu) - \dfrac{1}{2}[\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu] D_\mu D_\nu$$

Now we can recover the Klein-Gordon equation combining the terms underlined up there with the ##-m^2## in:

$$-\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu}D_{\mu} D_{\nu} - im\gamma^{\mu} D_{\mu} + im\gamma^{\nu}D_{\nu} - m^2 $$

I still need some time to reavaluate the additional term though...
 
Last edited:
Ended up with an additional term of the form:
$$ c = -\eta^{\mu \nu} (\partial_\mu i e A_\nu + ie A_\mu \partial_\nu - eA_\mu \partial_\nu) - \dfrac{1}{2}[\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu]D_\mu D_\nu - im\gamma^\mu D_\mu + I am \gamma^\nu D_\nu$$

I'll probably have to fiddle with the indices in order to make ##[D_\mu , D_\nu] ## appear, I'm just not sure how to go about doing this...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K