How Do You Prove the Limit of a Vector Function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the limit of a vector function, specifically demonstrating that lim(t→a) r(t) = b if and only if for every ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that if 0 < |t - a| < δ, then |r(t) - b| < ε. Participants highlight that this definition aligns with standard epsilon-delta criteria for limits. Additionally, a suggestion is made to consider the limit in terms of the components of the vector function, R(t) = , to further clarify the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Understanding of vector functions
  • Knowledge of component-wise limits
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in depth
  • Learn about vector function limits and their properties
  • Explore component-wise limit proofs for vector functions
  • Practice proving limits using epsilon-delta arguments
USEFUL FOR

Students in calculus or advanced mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus and limits, will benefit from this discussion.

physicsidiot1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
proof for a vector limit??

Homework Statement


Show that the lim(t-->a)r(t)=b. if and only if for every [tex]\epsilon[/tex]>0 there is a number [tex]\delta[/tex]>0 such that if 0<|t-a|<[tex]\delta[/tex] then |r(t)-b|<[tex]\epsilon[/tex]

This is asking to prove the limit of a vector function.
It seems to me that within the question, it is already answered...I don't know how else to show that limit exists other than with what is said above.


Homework Equations


usual epsilon delta stuff


The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know
 
Physics news on Phys.org


physicsidiot1 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the lim(t-->a)r(t)=b. if and only if for every [tex]\epsilon[/tex]>0 there is a number [tex]\delta[/tex]>0 such that if 0<|t-a|<[tex]\delta[/tex] then |r(t)-b|<[tex]\epsilon[/tex]

This is asking to prove the limit of a vector function.
It seems to me that within the question, it is already answered...I don't know how else to show that limit exists other than with what is said above.

I'm guessing here, but perhaps the above is not what you were given for definition of the limit of a vector function. Maybe your definition was given in terms of limits of components, something like this:

Define R(t) = <x(t),y(t),z(t)>. If

limt→ax(t) = b1 and
limt→ay(t) = b2 and
limt→az(t) = b3

then we say limt→aR(t) = b =<b1,b2,b3>

If that is the case, you have something to prove.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K