How do you read the Brewster angle formula / equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ddedeasx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the Brewster angle formula, specifically the meanings of the symbols n1, n2, and theta. Participants suggest that the Wikipedia page is a valuable resource for gaining insights into the formula. The equation tan(0B) = n2/n1 is highlighted as essential for the presentation. There is an emphasis on the importance of demonstrating effort in learning before seeking further assistance. Engaging with the material and asking specific questions is encouraged for deeper understanding.
ddedeasx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have a presentation tomorrow, in which I have to explain the formula used in the Brewster angle, so I have to say what each symbol there means (the n1, n2, tan ...)
Relevant Equations
tan(0B) = n2 /n1
So far all I know is that n1 and n2 represent the refractive indices of the two media, and so is theta (I think). Please help
 

Attachments

  • Captura.PNG
    Captura.PNG
    1.3 KB · Views: 129
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you read any resources about it? The wikipedia page is a good starting point for an explanation
 
ddedeasx said:
Homework Statement:: I have a presentation tomorrow, in which I have to explain the formula used in the Brewster angle, so I have to say what each symbol there means (the n1, n2, tan ...)
Relevant Equations:: tan(0B) = n2 /n1

So far all I know is that n1 and n2 represent the refractive indices of the two media, and so is theta (I think). Please help
brainpushups said:
Have you read any resources about it? The wikipedia page is a good starting point for an explanation
Yes, we require that you show some effort as a student before we can offer you tutorial help.

Please read through the Wikipedia article and post any questions you have about your reading. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top