How Do You Solve an ODE for a Particle Under Gravity and Retarding Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter loonychune
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the ordinary differential equation (ODE) for a particle moving vertically under the influence of gravity and a retarding force proportional to the square of its velocity, as presented in Kibble's 'Classical Mechanics'. The equation of motion is given by \(\ddot{z} = -g - k\dot{z}^2\), where \(k\) is a constant and \(g\) represents gravitational acceleration. The solution involves substituting \(p = \frac{dz}{dt}\) to transform the equation into a solvable form, ultimately leading to the position function \(z(t) = z_0 + \frac{1}{k}\ln\cos[\sqrt{gk}(t_0 - t)]\). The discussion highlights the importance of using separation of variables and trigonometric substitutions for integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with gravitational force concepts
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, including separation of variables
  • Experience with substitution methods in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in ODEs
  • Learn about trigonometric substitutions in integration
  • Explore advanced topics in classical mechanics, particularly forces and motion
  • Review Kibble's 'Classical Mechanics' for additional context and examples
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, as well as mathematicians and engineers dealing with differential equations and motion analysis.

loonychune
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Tough question -- tough ODE

1. I'm working over various texts this summer, one being Kibble's 'Classical Mechanics'. This being problem 15 on page 45. I'm stuck and your help would be much appreciated!

Q) A particle moves vertically under gravity and a retarding force proportional to the square of its velocity.

2. The relevant equation of motion is this:

[tex]\ddot{z} = -g -k\dot{z}^2[/tex] (k is a constant, g grav. acceleration)

What I need to work out is its position at time, t, i.e. [tex]z(t)[/tex].

3. If the force were proportional to the velocity, and not the square of it, I would integrate once and then the resulting ODE i'd solve by finding some integrating factor.

However, I have issues with the [tex]\left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)^2[/tex] term.

One thing I thought would fix this would be the substitution,

[tex]p = \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)[/tex]

This yields the equation,

[tex]pdp + (kp^2 + g)dz = 0[/tex]

which I made exact by multiplying through by

[tex]e^{2kz}[/tex]

which is then solved by integration -- yields,

[tex]\frac{p^2e^{2kz}}{2} + \frac{g}{2k}e^{2kz} = c[/tex]

where c is a constant.

Rearranging for p then and since

[tex]p = \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)[/tex]

we can find z:

[tex]\left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right) = \sqrt{2ce^{-2kz} - g/k}[/tex]

The GIVEN ANSWER is:

[tex]z = z_0 + \frac{1}{k}\ln\cos[\sqrt{gk}{(t_0 - t)}][/tex]

It's quite possible that [tex]c = -z_0[/tex] if i remember rightly, but I still cannot see how I'm going to get to the answer from here; rather in fact, how i might adequately find z(t) at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
loonychune said:
One thing I thought would fix this would be the substitution,

[tex]p = \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)[/tex]

This yields the equation,

[tex]pdp + (kp^2 + g)dz = 0[/tex]
How did you get this? In fact you don't have to resort to solving exact differential equations at all. Substituting as you have given yields:

[tex]-\frac{dp}{dt} = g+kp^2[/tex] which is solvable by separation of variables. You need to make a trigo substitution in order to integrate wrt p. Once you get that, substitute in p = dz/dt and integrate again. You'll get the answer.
 
Thankyou! A solution is borne.

[tex]\ddot{z} = \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{dp}{dz}\frac{dz}{dt}= p\frac{dp}{dz}[/tex]

is where the equation in question comes from. I am not really sure why I took this that far -- I think I have that method in mind for if say the ODE contains the independent variable z but not t explicitly.

Again, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K