MHB How Do You Solve the Exponential Equation 2^(4x-3) = 1/8?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shorty888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
shorty888
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Solve 2^(4x-3)=1/8, find the exact answer
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Solve

shorty888 said:
Solve 2^(4x-3)=1/8, find the exact answer

Since \(1/8=2^{-3}\), you want to solve:

\(2^{4x-3}=2^{-3}\)

so, now can you do it?

CB
 
Re: Solve

shorty888 said:
Solve 2^(4x-3)=1/8, find the exact answer

Compute logarithm base 2 of both terms...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: Solve

No, I don't understand.. I can't do it.. How??
 
Re: Solve

shorty888 said:
No, I don't understand.. I can't do it.. How??

You have $\displaystyle a=b \implies \log_{2} a= \log_{2} b$, so that $\displaystyle a=2^{4x-3},\ b=\frac{1}{8} \rightarrow 4x-3=-3$ and we have a first order algebraic equation...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: Solve

shorty888 said:
No, I don't understand.. I can't do it.. How??

In future please quote which post you are responding to (use the reply with quote option).

If you are referring to my post, the exponents on both sides are equal so: \(4x-3=-3\)

This is essentially the same as chisigma's method.

CB
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
980
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top