How do you solve this algebraic equation without using a calculator?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mukilab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Calculator
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the algebraic equation 4x + 8 = 33x^{\frac{1}{2}} without the use of a calculator. Participants explore various methods of substitution and factorization, as well as the challenges of solving the equation in an exam setting.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests substituting t as x^{\frac{1}{2}} and expresses difficulty in solving the resulting quadratic equation without a calculator.
  • Another participant agrees that the substitution is correct and mentions that the quadratic can be factored, but questions the validity of one of the solutions.
  • There is a discussion about the quadratic formula and its reliance on a calculator, with one participant expressing frustration over the complexity of calculations involved.
  • Some participants propose that the roots of the polynomial can be found through the rational roots theorem, suggesting possible rational roots to test.
  • One participant mentions an incorrect factorization attempt and acknowledges the need for correct factors that align with the original equation.
  • A later reply indicates that a friend pointed out a correct factorization into (4t-1)(t-8), leading to the realization that squaring the roots is necessary to find x.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the substitution method but express differing views on the factorization and the correctness of the solutions derived. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to solve the equation without a calculator.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the validity of their assumptions and calculations, particularly regarding the factorization and the application of the quadratic formula. There are also mentions of potential errors in earlier steps that could affect the final answers.

Mukilab
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
How would one solve the following WITHOUT a calculator?

Sub in t as [itex]x^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex]

[itex]4x+8=33x^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex]

I just don't see how to do this without a calculator.


If I take t^2=x, then sub it in I need to do the quadratic formula which is too hard without a calculator/would take too long in an exam. Even if I do the formula I get t=8,2 which I would then need to square route to get x but would be the wrong answer since x = 64 and 1/16...


Any help. Is t^2=x a wrong assumption? Surely it is right since x^1/2 squared gives x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mukilab said:
How would one solve the following WITHOUT a calculator?

Sub in t as [itex]x^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex]

[itex]4x+8=33x^{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex]

I just don't see how to do this without a calculator.


If I take t^2=x, then sub it in I need to do the quadratic formula which is too hard without a calculator/would take too long in an exam. Even if I do the formula I get t=8,2 which I would then need to square route to get x but would be the wrong answer since x = 64 and 1/16...


Any help. Is t^2=x a wrong assumption? Surely it is right since x^1/2 squared gives x?
Your substitution is the right one. After making the substitution, you will have a quadratic equation that can be factored.

There are two solutions for t. One solution for t is t = 8, but your other solution (t = 2) is not a solution.

Please show us your work.
 
Mark44 said:
Your substitution is the right one. After making the substitution, you will have a quadratic equation that can be factored.

There are two solutions for t. One solution for t is t = 8, but your other solution (t = 2) is not a solution.

Please show us your work.

Sorry for not showing my work, I just did so much and failed I thought it would be useless.

Nonetheless I tried 4t^2-33t+8=0 and then factoring that but without using the quadratic formula to give me the answer of t=8, I didn't see how else I could do it (the quadratic formula requiring a calculator since you have to square 33 to make 1089 and then get a square route...).

Then I tried factorising it into 4(t^2+2)=33t but I didn't really see where to go from there. Most of my working has just been repetitions of these.

I'm fairly sure that you can factorise it into (2t + 16)(2t + 1/2) but there was no way I would have ever gotten that without a calculator, so it is again useless.

Do you know of any methods through which to solve this?

Thanks for replying!



Quadratic formula workings; (33+sqrt(33^2-4(4)(8)))/8=8, 1/4

But then 8 and 1/4 are not the right answers (the answers are 64 and 1/16) :(
 
But then, how can 8 and 1/4 be the answers if in the ( )( ) equation they will have to multiply to give 8? Surely it must be 8 and 1?
 
But then 8 and 1/4 are not the right answers (the answers are 64 and 1/16)

You made the transformation t = x1/2. You have the roots for the polynomial in t, so convert them back to x.
 
Number Nine said:
You made the transformation t = x1/2. You have the roots for the polynomial in t, so convert them back to x.

The roots would be 2(sqrt2) and 1/2 however that's not the right answer (the right answer being 64 and 1/16).

That still doesn't answer how to do it without a calculator though. Got any insights?
 
You can try the rational roots theorem

if a rational number p/q is a root of the polynomial

[tex]a_n x^n + a_{n-1} x^{n-1} + ... + a_0[/tex]

then p is a factor of a_0 and q a factor of a_n.

In case of 4t^2 - 33t +8 =0, you get p = 8 or 4 or 2 or 1 and q = 4 or 2 or 1.

possible roots are 8,4,2,1,(1/2),(1/4), you just try all of these. Test exercises
nearly always have rational roots.

The producut of the roots is a_0 = 8, so if you found one root, the other is easy.
 
Mukilab said:
Nonetheless I tried 4t^2-33t+8=0 and then factoring that but without using the quadratic formula to give me the answer of t=8, I didn't see how else I could do it (the quadratic formula requiring a calculator since you have to square 33 to make 1089 and then get a square route...).
You don't need the quadratic formula. Factoring works just fine.
Mukilab said:
Then I tried factorising it into 4(t^2+2)=33t but I didn't really see where to go from there. Most of my working has just been repetitions of these.
Breaking up the equation as you show here is a complete dead end.

Mukilab said:
I'm fairly sure that you can factorise it into (2t + 16)(2t + 1/2) but there was no way I would have ever gotten that without a calculator, so it is again useless.
Your factors here are incorrect. They should multiply to 4t2 - 33t + 8, but instead they multiply to 4t2 +[/color] 33t + 8.
Mukilab said:
Do you know of any methods through which to solve this?
Yes - factoring. You should have been exposed to lots and lots of trinomial factorization problems in your algebra class, including some where the coefficient of the squared term wasn't 1. Do you remember doing this?
Mukilab said:
Thanks for replying!



Quadratic formula workings; (33+sqrt(33^2-4(4)(8)))/8=8, 1/4

But then 8 and 1/4 are not the right answers (the answers are 64 and 1/16) :(
 
I talked to my friend about this and he pointed out that you can factorise it into the brackets

(4t-1)(t-8)

Giving t=8,1/4

And since t=x^1/2, you need to square 8 and 1/4 rather than square routing it like I was doing.

Sorry for wasting your time, this turned out to be a very elementary mistake.
 
  • #10
Mukilab said:
I talked to my friend about this and he pointed out that you can factorise it into the brackets

(4t-1)(t-8)

Giving t=8,1/4

And since t=x^1/2, you need to square 8 and 1/4 rather than square routing it like I was doing.

Sorry for wasting your time, this turned out to be a very elementary mistake.

Yes, that's exactly it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K