How do you Treat Infinitesimals?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the treatment of infinitesimals and differentials in calculus, emphasizing that traditional calculus texts often present manipulations of differentials as informal or "handwavy." The chain rule's validity does not rely on cancelling infinitesimals but rather on finite quantities within limits. The conversation highlights the distinction between exploration and proof, advocating for rigorous justification when manipulating differentials. It also notes that non-standard analysis introduces infinitesimals through a new number system, while traditional calculus treats differentials as operations on functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically the chain rule and separation of variables.
  • Familiarity with differential notation and its application in calculus.
  • Basic knowledge of limits and their role in calculus proofs.
  • Awareness of non-standard analysis and its treatment of infinitesimals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the chain rule in detail to understand its foundations.
  • Learn about the separation of variables technique in ordinary differential equations (ODEs).
  • Explore non-standard analysis and its implications for calculus, particularly regarding infinitesimals.
  • Investigate the differences between differentials and infinitesimals in mathematical literature.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, educators teaching differential equations, mathematicians interested in the foundations of calculus, and anyone exploring the concepts of infinitesimals and differentials.

TheDemx27
Gold Member
Messages
169
Reaction score
13
All throughout calculus texts, the authors have always put conditions on the manipulation of differentials. They say that for the chain rule, the cancellation of the differentials is simply a way to remember the formula. When doing separation of variable for ODEs, texts always say something like: "Oh, so we group the ##dy##'s and ##dx##'s on both sides, even though that is kind of a handwavy way of handling the differentials and it's not how they actually work" or something like that. There is always some little side note that the manipulation isn't rigorous. In all my experiences, treating the differentials as variables and manipulating them as such works out fine.

How are you actually supposed to treat infinitesimals then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is a valuable exercise to work to understand the rigorous justification for the cases where dx terms are treated like ordinary numbers. Usually it's not too hard to understand. For instance the proof of the validity of the chain rule has nothing to do with cancelling out infinitesimals. All cancelling is done on finite quantities inside the limit parentheses. Separation of variables to get from ##\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{f(x)}{g(y)}## to ##\int g(y)dy=\int f(x)dx## can be done by multiplying both sides by ##g(y)##, integrating wrt x and then using substitution and the chain rule.

When you've done that for the main cases, you can apply the rule of thumb that there's a good chance it's illegal if you can't think of a rigorous justification.

However, it's helpful to distinguish between exploration and proof. When one is exploring possible avenues for a proof, it can be efficient to just assume without proof one can manipulate the differentials, in order to go on and see what happens next. If it turns out to be a dead end anyway, one will have saved the time it would have taken to justify the manipulation. If it turns out to not be a dead end, one can then go back and try to justify the manipulation.
 
Actually, most Calculus texts, all those except the relatively new "non-standard Analysis" texts, don't mention "infinitesmals" at all, they deal with limits instead
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hunt_mat
andrewkirk said:
Separation of variables to get from ##\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{f(x)}{g(y)}## to ##\int g(y)dy=\int f(x)dx## can be done by multiplying both sides by ##g(y)##, integrating wrt x and then using substitution and the chain rule.

\frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{f(x)}{g(y)}
\int g(y)\frac{dy}{dx} dx =\int f(x)dx
...?​
I don't know what bit of meaningful substitution you could do here.
 
TheDemx27 said:
I don't know what bit of meaningful substitution you could do here.
We use the substitution rule.
 
andrewkirk said:
##u=y, du=\frac{dy}{dx}dx##
##\int g(y)\frac{dy}{dx} dx=\int f(x)dx##
##\int g(u)du =\int f(x)dx##
and ##u=y## so
##\int g(y)dy=\int f(x)dx##
Is that what you meant?
 
You confused me by using the word "infinitesmals" in the title of the thread when the thread is really about "differentials"!
 
TheDemx27 said:
##u=y, du=\frac{dy}{dx}dx##
##\int g(y)\frac{dy}{dx} dx=\int f(x)dx##
##\int g(u)du =\int f(x)dx##
and ##u=y## so
##\int g(y)dy=\int f(x)dx##
Is that what you meant?
Yes, that's it.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You confused me by using the word "infinitesmals" in the title of the thread when the thread is really about "differentials"!
Sorry about that. I guess I don't know the difference between the two. Wikipedia seems to think they are the same thing. I'm guessing differentials are a subset of infinitesimals?
 
  • #10
No, "infinitesimals" don't exist at all in the usual real number system. In "non-standard analysis", that I referred to above, "infinitesimals" are developed by constructing an entirely new number system that includes numbers, in addition to the usual real numbers, called "infinitesimals": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-standard_analysis

Differentials, on the other hand, are an operation on functions- given any function, f, such that \frac{df}{dx}= g, the "differential" is defined as df= g(x)dx and "dx" is essentially left undefined. In ordinary Calculus, "df= g(x)dx" can be approximated by using a small value for dx. In non-standard analysis "differentials" can be identified with "infinitesimals".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TheDemx27

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K