How Do You Visualize the Graph of x + y + z = 2?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DWill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on visualizing the graph of the equation x + y + z = 2, specifically in the context of three-dimensional geometry. Participants explore methods for representing this plane and clarify the distinction between equations of two and three variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in visualizing the graph of the plane and suggests that equations of two variables are easier to graph, questioning the nature of three-variable equations.
  • Another participant proposes selecting specific values for z (e.g., z=0, z=-1, z=1) to visualize the plane by connecting lines in 3D, emphasizing the concept of "level sets" or "level curves."
  • A third participant explains that a single equation in three dimensions represents a two-dimensional object, such as a plane, and discusses using intercepts to visualize the plane, identifying points (0, 0, 2), (2, 0, 0), and (0, 2, 0) as forming a triangle in the first octant.
  • Another participant suggests calculating the plane normal vector as a method for easier visualization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for visualizing the plane, with multiple approaches and ideas presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the concept of intercepts and the distinction between lines and planes in three dimensions, but do not fully resolve the implications of these concepts for visualization.

DWill
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble visualizing what the graph of the plane x + y + z = 2 looks like. It is easier for me to graph equations of 2 variables. Also, I thought equations of 2 variables are "planes", while equations of 3 variables are of a solid? Is there any steps to follow or something to graph these equations of 3 variables?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DWill said:
I'm having trouble visualizing what the graph of the plane x + y + z = 2 looks like. It is easier for me to graph equations of 2 variables.
Trying graphing for selected values of z. Let z=0, z=-1, z=1 for example. Then visualise a plane connecting those lines for those respective z values in 3D.

Also, I thought equations of 2 variables are "planes", while equations of 3 variables are of a solid? Is there any steps to follow or something to graph these equations of 3 variables?
There are lines and planes in 3D as well which may require 3 variables to represent. You can't, for example, represent the equation of a line in 3D by a single equation. The steps you should follow in visualising are about graphing what the "level sets" or "level curves" would look like for a specific value of z,x or why.
 
It requires 3 numbers to designate point in 3 dimensions (that's why it is 3 dimensions!) If you write a single equation connecting those three numbers, then, given any two you could solve for the third. That's why a single equation, in 3 dimensions, represents a two dimensional object such as a plane.

One way you can "visualize" a plane is to use the "intercepts" like in 2 dimensional graphing of a line. Any point on the z-axis, for example, has both x and y equal to 0. In your example, x+ y+ z= 2, if x and y are both equal to 0, z= 2. The plane must contain the point (0, 0, 2). In fact, for that equation it is easy to see that the other two intercepts are (2, 0, 0) and (0, 2, 0). Those three points form a triangle and the portiona of the plane in the first "octant" (where the 3 variables are all positive) is the interior of that triangle. The plane itself "lies on" that triangle.

Defennnder's method, of looking at different of z, also works very nicely for non-linear functions in which the surfaces are not planes. It gives the "countour maps" just like geodesic maps of mountains that show altitude.
 
I recommend you calculate the plane normal vector for easier visualization.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K