Adesh
- 735
- 191
That solves my whole problem. Thank you so much.PeroK said:The same difference as differentiating with respect to ##y_1## and ##y_2## in the above examples.
The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of functions of multiple variables, specifically addressing why a function \( f(x,y) \) can appear to lose its dependency on \( x \) and \( y \) when restricted to a defined rectangular region. Participants clarify that while \( f \) remains a function of \( x \) and \( y \), the derivatives may be zero due to the nature of dummy variables in integration, as illustrated by the Biot-Savart Law and the example of Coulomb's force. The distinction between primed and unprimed variables is emphasized, highlighting that \( J \) is a function of \( x' \) rather than \( x \).
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, physicists, and students of calculus who are looking to deepen their understanding of multivariable functions and their derivatives, particularly in the context of physics applications.
That solves my whole problem. Thank you so much.PeroK said:The same difference as differentiating with respect to ##y_1## and ##y_2## in the above examples.
In that response I was trying to illustrate to you the way we think of axes, but:Adesh said:So, what’s the difference between differentiating with respect to ##x## and ##x’## ?
I think the main point that you need to remember is to think of the axes as the set of real numbers. The function you have of both ##x## and ##x'## who are on the same "axis" can be seen as ##\vec a = f(x, x')\vec e##.Adesh said:That solves my whole problem. Thank you so much.