How does a geometric series converge, or have a sum?

In summary, a geometric series has a sum because the terms become increasingly smaller, causing the sum to approach a specific limit. This can be seen by using partial sums, where each term adds a smaller amount to the overall sum. As the number of terms approaches infinity, the sum converges to a specific value.
  • #1
Destroxia
204
7

Homework Statement



How does a geometric series have a sum, or converge?

Homework Equations



Sum of Geometric Series = ##\frac {a} {1-r}##

If r ≥ ±1, the series diverges. If -1 < r < 1, the series converges.

The Attempt at a Solution



How exactly does a infinite geometric series have a sum, or converge (tend to) a specific limit?

I understand that it is due to partial sums that we are able to derive the formula for the sum of a geometric series, yet at the same time I don't understand how a sequence that will be always multiplied by itself to infinity can ever STOP and have a final sum, or how it converges (tends toward) a specific limit.

For example ##\sum\limits_{k=1}^{∞} (\frac {2} {3})^k##. This sum works out to 3, and does converge as r > -1 and r < 1. Why? The partial sums proof makes no sense to me, and how on Earth do things ever cancel to end up summing to 3?

Please explain to me if I have some conceptual misunderstanding of converges or sums of series, or if I'm just overlooking something...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
RyanTAsher said:

Homework Statement



How does a geometric series have a sum, or converge?

Homework Equations



Sum of Geometric Series = ##\frac {a} {1-r}##

If r ≥ ±1, the series diverges. If -1 < r < 1, the series converges.

The Attempt at a Solution



How exactly does a infinite geometric series have a sum, or converge (tend to) a specific limit?

I understand that it is due to partial sums that we are able to derive the formula for the sum of a geometric series, yet at the same time I don't understand how a sequence that will be always multiplied by itself to infinity can ever STOP and have a final sum, or how it converges (tends toward) a specific limit.

For example ##\sum\limits_{k=1}^{∞} (\frac {2} {3})^k##. This sum works out to 3, and does converge as r > -1 and r < 1. Why? The partial sums proof makes no sense to me, and how on Earth do things ever cancel to end up summing to 3?

Please explain to me if I have some conceptual misunderstanding of converges or sums of series, or if I'm just overlooking something...
What proof are you familiar with?

What is it in that proof that you don't understand, or what is it that you can't 'buy'?
 
  • #3
Converging to something means it doesn't matter how much to add to that series(by next terms) (since they get smaller and smaller in our case) the sum does not exceed a particular value(the converging point).what is it u specifically want?? cheers.
 
  • #4
SammyS said:
What proof are you familiar with?

What is it in that proof that you don't understand, or what is it that you can't 'buy'?

I don't exactly understand how at the end of the proof you can just ignore all the terms in between the kth terms and first few non-kth terms, and just divide those out. I understand the factoring out the a of the general equation ar^k, but how can you ignore the quotient of all the in between terms.
 
  • #5
kiritee Gak said:
Converging to something means it doesn't matter how much to add to that series(by next terms) (since they get smaller and smaller in our case) the sum does not exceed a particular value(the converging point).what is it u specifically want?? cheers.

That actually helps a lot to think of it that way... In other words since r ≤ ±1, the terms become so insignificant that their effect on the sum is negligible?
 
  • #6
kiritee Gak said:
Converging to something means it doesn't matter how much to add to that series(by next terms) (since they get smaller and smaller in our case) the sum does not exceed a particular value(the converging point). what is it you specifically want?? cheers.
For a series in general, having successive terms get smaller does not guarantee convergence of the series.
 
  • #7
SammyS said:
For a series in general, having successive terms get smaller does not guarantee convergence of the series.
i think i specifically mentioned "in our case" which is 2/3 series Ryan talking.
 
  • #8
kiritee Gak said:
Converging to something means it doesn't matter how much to add to that series(by next terms) (since they get smaller and smaller in our case) the sum does not exceed a particular value(the converging point).what is it u specifically want?? cheers.
Please don't use "text speak" ("u" for "you") here at PF. From the forum rules (https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-global-guidelines.414380/)
SMS messaging shorthand ("text-message-speak"), such as using "u" for "you", "please" for "please", or "wanna" for "want to" is not acceptable.
 
  • #9
RyanTAsher said:
That actually helps a lot to think of it that way... In other words since r ≤ ±1, the terms become so insignificant that their effect on the sum is negligible?
Their effect is not insignificant, but they don't cause the partial sums to go past a specific value. Here's an example of a geometric series with r = 0.9.
$$\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac 9 {10^n}$$
The partial sums go like this:
S1 = .9
S2 = .9 + .09 = .99
S3 = .9 + .09 + .009 = .999
and so forth.
Each partial sum merely adds one more 9 onto the end of the decimal fraction. All of the partial sums are bounded above by 1, but successive partial sums get closer and closer to 1 as more terms are added, allowing us to conclude that the sum of the series is 1.
 
  • #10
RyanTAsher said:
How exactly does a infinite geometric series have a sum, or converge (tend to) a specific limit?

I understand that it is due to partial sums that we are able to derive the formula for the sum of a geometric series, yet at the same time I don't understand how a sequence that will be always multiplied by itself to infinity can ever STOP and have a final sum, or how it converges (tends toward) a specific limit.

For example ##\sum\limits_{k=1}^{∞} (\frac {2} {3})^k##. This sum works out to 3, and does converge as r > -1 and r < 1. Why? The partial sums proof makes no sense to me, and how on Earth do things ever cancel to end up summing to 3?

Please explain to me if I have some conceptual misunderstanding of converges or sums of series, or if I'm just overlooking something...
The sum is 3 because for each n, the nth partial sum is
$$\frac{1-\big(\frac 2 3\big)^{n+1}}{1-\frac 2 3} = 3-3\left(\frac 2 3\right)^{n+1}$$ and the second term on the right goes to zero as n goes to infinity. If that doesn't make any sense to you, there's probably something missing in your understanding of limits of sequences. Perhaps you can be more specific about what's bothering you.

Note in particular that every partial sum is less than 3.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
  • #11
Fredrik said:
The sum is 3 because for each n, the nth partial sum is
$$\frac{1-\big(\frac 2 3\big)^{n+1}}{1-\frac 2 3} = 3-3\left(\frac 2 3\right)^{n+1}$$ and the second term on the right goes to zero as n goes to infinity. If that doesn't make any sense to you, there's probably something missing in your understanding of limits of sequences. Perhaps you can be more specific about what's bothering you.

Note in particular that every partial sum is less than 3.

Thank you that makes a lot more sense when you use the partial sums equation, rather than just the sum of an infinite geometric series equation. It makes sense now!
 
  • #12
Your problem seemed to be you could not argue with the algebra yet could not imagine how it could be. Attached (excuse crudity of my first attempt with whiteboard but I hope it gives the idea) a visualisation convincingly showing
1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... → 1

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/82466
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2015-04-24 09.55.50.png
    Screenshot 2015-04-24 09.55.50.png
    23.6 KB · Views: 516
Last edited:
  • #13
epenguin said:
Your problem seemed to be you could not argue with the algebra yet could not imagine how it could be. Attached (excuse crudity of my first attempt with whiteboard but I hope it gives the idea) a visualisation convincingly showing
1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... → 1

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/82466

Thank you for the help, the visual representation helps a lot more too, actually being able to see something, essentially converge.
 

1. What is a geometric series?

A geometric series is a series of numbers where each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by a constant ratio. For example, the series 1, 2, 4, 8, 16... is a geometric series with a common ratio of 2.

2. How does a geometric series converge?

A geometric series converges if the absolute value of the common ratio is less than 1. This means that as the series continues, the terms get smaller and smaller, approaching a finite limit. If the absolute value of the common ratio is equal to or greater than 1, the series will diverge and not have a finite sum.

3. What is the formula for finding the sum of a geometric series?

The formula for finding the sum of a geometric series is S = a / (1 - r), where S is the sum, a is the first term, and r is the common ratio. This formula only applies to geometric series that converge.

4. Can a geometric series have an infinite sum?

Yes, a geometric series can have an infinite sum if the absolute value of the common ratio is equal to 1. In this case, the terms in the series do not approach a finite limit and the series diverges.

5. How is a geometric series related to exponential functions?

A geometric series is closely related to exponential functions because the terms in a geometric series can be written in the form of an exponential function. For example, the series 1, 2, 4, 8, 16... can be written as the function f(x) = 2^x, where x is the term number.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
633
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
644
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
890
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
645
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
314
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
640
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
906
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
741
Back
Top