How Does a Minimal Polynomial Differ from a Characteristic Polynomial?

Click For Summary
A minimal polynomial is the monic polynomial of the smallest degree that a matrix satisfies, while the characteristic polynomial is derived from the eigenvalues of the matrix. For example, the matrix A has a characteristic polynomial of (λ - 2)², but its minimal polynomial is λ - 2, as it satisfies A - 2I = 0. In contrast, matrix B has the same characteristic polynomial but does not satisfy A - 2I = 0, making its minimal polynomial identical to its characteristic polynomial. The minimal polynomial must include all eigenvalues as factors, and when a matrix has multiple eigenvalues with independent eigenvectors, the minimal polynomial can be of lower degree than the characteristic polynomial. Understanding these distinctions is crucial in abstract algebra and matrix theory.
dexterdev
Messages
194
Reaction score
1
I have a small idea on what irreducible and primitive polynomials are in Abstract algebra. But what is minimal polynomial?

-Devanand T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not look it up and then ask about the bits where you get confused?
 
The matrix
A= \begin{bmatrix}2 & 0 \\ 0 & 2\end{bmatrix}
has 2 as a double eigenvalue. Its characteristic polynomial is \lambda^2- 4\lambda + 4= (\lambda- 2)^2. Of course, the matrix itself satisfies A^2- 4A+ 4I= 0. But, here, it also satisfies A- 2I= 0. That is its "minimal" polynomial.

On the other hand,
B= \begin{bmatrix}2 & 1 \\ 0 & 2\end{bmatrix}
also has 2 as a double eigenvalue and, of course, satisfies its charateristic equation, (2- A)^2= 0, but does not satisfy A- 2= 0 so its minimal polynomial is the same as its characteristic polynomial.

One can show that all eigenvalues must be "represented", as factors, in the minimal polynomial so, if all eigenvalues are distinct, all the linear factors must be there- the minimal polynomial is the same as the characteristic polynomial. But if a matrix has a multiple eigenvalue with more than one independent corresponding eignvector, then we can remove some of those factors and get a minimal polynomial of degree lower than the characteristic polynomial.

I also recommend you look at the website Simon Bridge links to.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K