How Does a Particle Behave in a 2-Level Finite Potential Well?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the transcendental equation for energy eigenstates of a particle in a 2-level finite potential well defined by the potential function V(x). The potential is segmented into four regions, with specific wavefunction solutions provided for each region. The participant successfully derived wavefunctions for regions where E > V(x) but struggled to eliminate coefficients C and D to arrive at the transcendental equation. The participant speculated on the implications of the energy range 2Vo < E < 40Vo but required further assistance in simplifying the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wavefunctions and potential wells.
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of transcendental equations and their significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of trigonometric functions and exponential decay.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of transcendental equations in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the application of boundary conditions in solving Schrödinger's equation.
  • Explore the properties of wavefunctions in finite potential wells.
  • Investigate techniques for eliminating variables in complex equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying finite potential wells and energy eigenstates, as well as educators looking for practical examples of wavefunction analysis.

IainH
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Consider a particle of mass m subject to the following potential function (taking Vo and L
to be positive):
V (x) =
40 Vo if x < 0;
0 if 0 < x < L/2;
2 Vo if L/2 < x < L;
40 Vo if x > L.

(a) Derive the transcendental equation for energy eigenstates having an energy
2 Vo < E < 40 Vo.
To simplify the mathematics and numerics, for the rest of this question take h = 1, L = 1,
m = 1, and choose (in this system of units) Vo = 1.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the solution for the wavefunction in all areas.
For x<0,

## \psi_1(x) = A exp(k_1 x)+B exp(-k_1 x) ##

Using the condition that ##psi(x)##=0 when x approaches infinity,

##\psi_1(x) for x<0 = A exp(k_1 x)##

For region 2, (0<x<L/2), solution is oscillatory as E>V(x), so

## \psi_2(x) = \alpha sin(k_2*x) + \beta cos(k_2*x).##

Applying boundary conditions: at x=0, ## \psi_1(x)=\psi_2(x)##, and the derivatives of## (\psi_1)/\psi_2 ## must also be equal at x=0.

##A exp(0) = \alpha sin(0)+\beta cos(0)
k_1 A exp(0) = \alpha cos(0) -k_2 \beta sin(0)##
##\Rightarrow \beta = A,\alpha = {\frac{k_1}{k_2}}A##

## \Rightarrow \psi_2(x) = {\frac{k_1}{k_2}}A sin(k_2 x) + A cos(k_2 x).##

For region 3, (L/2<x<L), psi is also oscillatory as E>V(x), so

##\psi_3(x) = C sin(k_3 x)+D cos(k_3 x)##

Again, I applied the boundary conditions, where ##\psi_2(x=L/2) = psi_3(x=L/2)##, and the respective derivatives at x=L/2, which produced two equations. Dividing one equation by the other allows the 'A' coefficients to be cancelled.

## \psi_2(L/2) = \psi_3(L/2)\Rightarrow {\frac{k_1}{k_2}}A sin({\frac{k_2 L}{2}}) + A cos({\frac{k_2 L}{2}}) = C sin({\frac{k_3 L}{2}}) + D cos({\frac{k_3 L}{2}})##(1)

Taking derivatives and letting x = L/2;

##{\frac{k_1}{2}} A cos({\frac{k_2 L}{2}}) - {\frac{k_2}{2}} A sin({\frac{k_2 L}{2}) = {\frac{k_3}{2}} C cos({\frac{k_3 L}{2}}) +{\frac{k_3}{2}} D sin({\frac{k_3 L}{2}})}## (2)

Dividing ##{\frac{(1)}{(2)}} \Rightarrow {\frac{{\frac{k_1}{k_2}} A sin({\frac{k_2 L}{2}}) + A cos({\frac{k_2 L}{2}})}{{\frac{k_1}{2}} A cos({\frac{k_2 L}{2}}) - {\frac{k_2}{2}} A sin({\frac{k_2 L}{2})}}} = {\frac{C sin({\frac{k_3 L}{2}}) + D cos({\frac{k_3 L}{2}})}{{\frac{k_3}{2}} C cos({\frac{k_3 L}{2}}) -{\frac{k_3}{2}} D sin({\frac{k_3 L}{2}})}}(3)##

For region 4, x>L, psi_4(x) is decaying, and applying the boundary condition as in region 1,

##\psi_4(x) = G exp(-k_1 x).##

I let ##psi_3(x=L) = psi_4(x=L)##, and the respective derivatives equal each other when x=L. This produced another two equations.

##C sin(k_3 L) + D cos(k_3 L) = G exp(-k_1 L)## (4)

##k_3 C cos (k_3 L) - k_3 D sin(k_3 L) = -k_1 G exp(-k_1 L)## (5)

Dividing (5) by (4) gives:

##{\frac{k_3 C cos (k_3 L) - k_3 D sin(k_3 L)}{C sin(k_3 L) + D cos(k_3 L)}} = -k_1## (6)

Dividing one by the other allows the 'G' coefficients to be removed as above.

I'm then left with a mess of sines and cosines with the factors C and D. I can't seem to get rid of the C and D coefficients to get the required transcendental energy solution. Most of my efforts has been trying to plug in (6) into (3), to cancel C and D, but I've had no luck so far.

Am I missing something here? Any help would be much appreciated. I was thinking that perhaps as ## 2 V_0 < E< 40 V_0,## the wave function won't be found below ## E = 2 V_0##, but I don't think this is correct.

Thanks very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K