How Does a Particle's Energy State Change in a Non-Uniform 2D Corridor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the energy state changes of a particle constrained in a non-uniform 2D corridor defined by varying widths L1 and L2. The energy eigenstates are expressed as wavefunctions that depend on the corridor's width, with specific forms for regions where x is less than x1 and greater than x2. The participants explore the implications of approximating the wavefunction in the transition region between x1 and x2, suggesting that the approximation can yield an exact eigenstate under certain conditions. The conversation also touches on the behavior of odd states and their representation in the wavefunction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wavefunctions and energy eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with the particle-in-a-box model and its implications for energy quantization.
  • Knowledge of linear approximations and their applications in quantum systems.
  • Basic grasp of boundary conditions and their effects on wavefunctions in constrained systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy eigenstates in non-uniform potentials using quantum mechanics textbooks.
  • Explore the concept of linear approximations in quantum wavefunctions, particularly in varying boundary conditions.
  • Research the behavior of odd states in quantum systems and their mathematical representations.
  • Examine journal articles that discuss particle dynamics in non-uniform potentials for deeper insights.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists exploring particle dynamics in constrained systems, and anyone interested in advanced wavefunction analysis in non-uniform potentials.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,611
Reaction score
611
Suppose we have a particle of mass ##m## moving freely in the xy-plane, except for being constrained by hard walls to have ##-L/2 < y < L/2##. Now, the energy eigenstates would be something like

##\psi (x,y) = C \psi_x (x) \psi_y (y) = C e^{-ikx}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L}\right) ##,

where ##n## would have to be an odd integer, it seems. So, now the total energy ##E## would be a sum from the free-particle motion in the x-direction and particle-in-box motion in y-direction.

Now, suppose that the 2d "corridor" the particle is moving in is not of constant width ##L##, but has some width ##L_1## when ##x < x_1## and other width ##L_2## when ##x > x_2##. Also, between ##x_1## and ##x_2## the width increases linearly from ##L_1## to ##L_2##.

In the region ##x < x_1## the energy eigenfunctions would be like ##\psi (x,y) = C_1 e^{ik_1 x}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L_1}\right)## and in region ##x > x_2## they would be like ##\psi (x,y) = C_2 e^{ik_2 x}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L_2}\right)##. If ##L_2 > L_1##, it would seem to be required that ##k_2 > k_1## to make the total energy eigenvalue the same in both regions despite the ground-state energy of the particle-in-box like y-motion being smaller when the width of the corridor is larger.

Questions:

1. If the distance between ##x_1## and ##x_2## is very large compared compared to the difference ##| L_1 - L_2 |##, can the wavefunction between ##x_1## and ##x_2## be approximated by something like

##\psi (x,y) = Ce^{ik(x)x}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L(x)}\right)##,

where the functions ##L(x)## and ##k(x)## change linearly between ##x = x_1## and ##x = x_2## ?

2. Is this kind of a problem described in any textbook or journal article ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I would expect so, but I'm not sure if that approximation tells you what you want, because it doesn't reflect the dynamics of the particle. The slope transfers momentum between the two directions.

What about the odd states, by the way (sine instead of cosine)?
 
Oh, yes, there are also the odd states. I was thinking of this as some kind of an exercise I invented myself. I think it's possible to show that the approximation approaches an exact eigenstate when ##\left|\frac{L_2 - L_1}{x_2 - x_1}\right| \rightarrow 0##, by showing that the energy standard deviation approaches zero at that limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K