How Does Battery EMF Affect Power Dissipation in a DC Circuit?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 5K views
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The positive terminals of two batteries with emf’s of E1 and E2, respectively, are connected together. Here E2 > E1. The circuit is completed by connecting the negative terminals. If each battery has an internal resistance r, the rate with which electrical energy is converted to chemical energy in the smaller battery is:

A. E1^2/r
B. E1^2/2r
C. (E2 − E1)*E1/r
D. (E2 − E1)*E1/2r
E. E2^2/2r


Homework Equations


P = V^2/R


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not entirely sure how to analyze this. It seems to me that the power dissipated by the resistors if (E2 + E1)^2/2r. I know that's not what the question is asking for, but is that correct by itself? Whatever energy is created chemically will be dissipated in the internal resistance of the batteries.

Now, if I was subtract off the rate of chemical energy provided by the E2 (the larger) source, then I should get the remaining energy, which is that provided by the E1 (the smaller) source. This is probably all jibberish, but if anyone has any ideas pointing me in the right direction that'd be great.

Thanks a lot for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eprparadox said:
It seems to me that the power dissipated by the resistors if (E2 + E1)^2/2r. I know that's not what the question is asking for, but is that correct by itself?

You get E1+E2 when the positive terminal of one battery is connected to the negative terminal of the other. This is not the case here. Read the problem.
 
Alright, my fault. But I think I get it now.

So I ended up using kirchhoffs voltage law over the loop that would be if you were to draw this out and I came up with:

E2 - i*r - i*r - E1 = 0. I multiplied by i to both sides in order to get an energy (rate of energy) equation and I also brought the E1 to the other side because we're looking for the energy that E1 converts to chemical energy:

E2*i - 2*i^2*r = E2*i. Now, i is just equal to (E2 - E1) / 2*r. I substitute that in and get as an answer:

(E2 - E1)*E1 / *2r which is answer D. Does this reasoning sound ok?