No.AshPowers said:Summary: Shouldn't it?
Yes, but that was not a point in space, it was a point in time so it was nothing like an "explosion"If it all started with a big bang of incredible density and energy
No, there's no need to posit that. Things moved away from each other faster than light but there was little or no proper motion so no speeding tickets were issued. I suggest the link in my signature, does that mean there must be particles that can travel faster than light?
Because it was the same in all directions, so no "escape" was necessaryHow would anything escape the grip of that kind of gravity?
Yes but not when EVERYTHING around it has the same density. What direction would it move?I was under the impression that at a certain threshold of mass/density, it turns into a black hole, right?
See aboveHow did the emergence/early universe just skip past this? Or spring out of it? What is the explanation here?
AshPowers said:I was under the impression that at a certain threshold of mass/density, it turns into a black hole, right?
The Big Bang Theory (BBT) explains the origin and evolution of the universe, but it does not directly address the concept of black holes. However, BBT does provide evidence and explanations for the formation and behavior of objects that were previously thought to be black holes.
BBT provides evidence for the existence of objects that were previously thought to be black holes through observations of the cosmic microwave background radiation, the expansion of the universe, and the distribution of galaxies and dark matter. These observations support the idea that these objects are actually supermassive stars or dense clusters of stars, rather than black holes.
BBT explains the formation of objects that were previously thought to be black holes through the process of stellar evolution. According to BBT, supermassive stars and dense clusters of stars can form from the collapse of gas and dust in the early universe. These objects can also grow in size through mergers with other objects, such as galaxies.
While BBT does not directly address black holes, it does provide explanations for the observed behavior of objects that were previously thought to be black holes. For example, BBT can explain the extreme gravitational pull and high temperatures of these objects through the processes of accretion and fusion, which occur in supermassive stars and dense clusters of stars.
The traditional understanding of black holes is based on the theory of general relativity, which predicts the existence of singularities - points of infinite density and gravity. BBT's explanation for objects previously thought to be black holes is based on the principles of stellar evolution and does not involve the concept of singularities. Additionally, BBT suggests that these objects may not be true black holes, but rather dense and massive objects that exhibit similar properties.