How Does Capacitor and Resistor Parallel Impedance Vary with Frequency?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 14K views
flash
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
I know the impedance of a capacitor is,

[tex] \frac {1}{j \omega C}[/tex]

so in an audio circuit it let's more high frequency energy through, which is obvious looking at the equation. When a capacitor is in parallel with a fixed resistor, I worked out the magnitude of the impedance of the pair to be

[tex] \frac{R \omega C}{\sqrt{R^2 + (\omega C)^2}}[/tex]

and this pair should still have lower impedance at higher frequencies, right?
So my question is, how does this expression reflect this? I just can't see it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
flash said:
I know the impedance of a capacitor is,

[tex] \frac {1}{j \omega C}[/tex]

so in an audio circuit it let's more high frequency energy through, which is obvious looking at the equation. When a capacitor is in series with a fixed resistor, I worked out the magnitude of the impedance of the pair to be

[tex] \frac{R \omega C}{\sqrt{R^2 + (\omega C)^2}}[/tex]

and this pair should still have lower impedance at higher frequencies, right?
So my question is, how does this expression reflect this? I just can't see it.

first caps and inductors have reactance, the resistance plus reactance is the impedance of the circuit. just correcting a nomenclature mistake.

second i have no idea how you got that for the total impedance of the circuit

[tex] V=I|Z|[/tex]

[tex] |Z|= \sqrt{R^2 + (\chi _c)^2}}[/tex]
[tex] |Z|= \sqrt{R^2 + (\frac{1}{j \omega C})^2}}[/tex]

as you see with omega in the denominator as freq goes down impedance goes to infinity
 
Last edited:
ice109 said:
second i have no idea how you got that for the total impedance of the circuit
ahhh i meant parallel, sorry

I got it like this:
[tex] \frac {1}{Z_eq} = \frac {1}{R} + \frac {1}{j \omega C}[/tex]

[tex] Z_eq = \frac {R \omega C}{R + j \omega C}[/tex]

[tex] |Z_eq| = \frac {R \omega C}{\sqrt{R^2 + ( \omega C )^2}}[/tex]

Thanks for your help with this.

edit: should the second term in the first equation be jwC, not 1 on? could be my problem :confused:
 
Last edited:
flash said:
ahhh i meant parallel, sorry

I got it like this:
[tex] \frac {1}{Z_eq} = \frac {1}{R} + \frac {1}{j \omega C}[/tex]

[tex] Z_eq = \frac {R \omega C}{R + j \omega C}[/tex]

[tex] |Z_eq| = \frac {R \omega C}{\sqrt{R^2 + ( \omega C )^2}}[/tex]

Thanks for your help with this.

edit: should the second term in the first equation be jwC, not 1 on? could be my problem :confused:
a high pass filter is a cap and a resistor in series though
 
The circuit I'm working on has a number of capacitors that can be switched in parallel with a resistor to give different frequency response depending on which one you select.

I reworked the above as:
[tex] \frac {1}{z_{eq}} = \frac {1}{R} + j \omega C[/tex]

which gives
[tex] |z_{eq}| = \frac {R}{\sqrt{1 + ( \omega CR)^2}}[/tex]
 
Last edited: