How Does Carbon-12 Have a Lower Rest Energy Than Its Separate Nucleons?

Click For Summary
Carbon-12 has a lower rest energy than its separate nucleons due to the binding energy released when protons and neutrons combine to form the nucleus. Although individual protons and neutrons have a greater mass, the mass of the bound carbon-12 atom is reduced because some mass is converted into energy during the binding process, as described by E=mc^2. This results in the total mass of carbon-12 being exactly 12 u. Understanding nuclear binding energy clarifies how mass can decrease in a bound system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of studying these concepts thoroughly for better comprehension.
fridakahlo
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


"You might wonder how six protons and six neutrons, each having a mass larger than 1 u, can be combined with six electrons to form a carbon-12 atom having a mass of exactly 12 u. The bound system of carbon-12 has a lower rest energy than that of six separate protons and six separate neutrons. According to E=mc^2, this lower rest energy corresponds to a smaller mass for the bound system. The difference in mass accounts for the binding energy when the particles are combined to form the nucleus."

Homework Equations


E=mc^2
1amu= 1.660539e-27 kg

The Attempt at a Solution


I came across this passage in my textbook, and I'm having difficulty in seeing how the rest energy for carbon-12 can be lower than that of six separate protons or six separate neutrons. My understanding is that the more mass the greater the rest energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a little hint...
To solve your confusion on how the total mass can be equal to 12u, when the protons are bonded, some of their mass is expended as energy for the bonding, resulting in the 12u.
:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes fridakahlo
Thank you! (: I just finished reading up on nuclear binding energy, and it has become a lot clearer now.
 
  • Like
Likes Uranic_Wabbit
fridakahlo said:
Thank you! (: I just finished reading up on nuclear binding energy, and it has become a lot clearer now.
Great Job! :smile:
Always to be sure to check your textbook for topics that are somewhat confusing or which you are not particularly sure on, and if that doesn't work it is always fine to look up the term itself on the browser. Heads up, make sure not to simply look up the solution until you have an answer you are somewhat confident about. Not doing this results in all your previous work on the problem turning obsolete.
:wink:
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...