How Does Carbon-12 Have a Lower Rest Energy Than Its Separate Nucleons?

AI Thread Summary
Carbon-12 has a lower rest energy than its separate nucleons due to the binding energy released when protons and neutrons combine to form the nucleus. Although individual protons and neutrons have a greater mass, the mass of the bound carbon-12 atom is reduced because some mass is converted into energy during the binding process, as described by E=mc^2. This results in the total mass of carbon-12 being exactly 12 u. Understanding nuclear binding energy clarifies how mass can decrease in a bound system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of studying these concepts thoroughly for better comprehension.
fridakahlo
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


"You might wonder how six protons and six neutrons, each having a mass larger than 1 u, can be combined with six electrons to form a carbon-12 atom having a mass of exactly 12 u. The bound system of carbon-12 has a lower rest energy than that of six separate protons and six separate neutrons. According to E=mc^2, this lower rest energy corresponds to a smaller mass for the bound system. The difference in mass accounts for the binding energy when the particles are combined to form the nucleus."

Homework Equations


E=mc^2
1amu= 1.660539e-27 kg

The Attempt at a Solution


I came across this passage in my textbook, and I'm having difficulty in seeing how the rest energy for carbon-12 can be lower than that of six separate protons or six separate neutrons. My understanding is that the more mass the greater the rest energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a little hint...
To solve your confusion on how the total mass can be equal to 12u, when the protons are bonded, some of their mass is expended as energy for the bonding, resulting in the 12u.
:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes fridakahlo
Thank you! (: I just finished reading up on nuclear binding energy, and it has become a lot clearer now.
 
  • Like
Likes Uranic_Wabbit
fridakahlo said:
Thank you! (: I just finished reading up on nuclear binding energy, and it has become a lot clearer now.
Great Job! :smile:
Always to be sure to check your textbook for topics that are somewhat confusing or which you are not particularly sure on, and if that doesn't work it is always fine to look up the term itself on the browser. Heads up, make sure not to simply look up the solution until you have an answer you are somewhat confident about. Not doing this results in all your previous work on the problem turning obsolete.
:wink:
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top