How Does Charge Density Inside a Conductor Dissolve Over Time?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of charge density within a conductor over time, specifically how free charge density dissolves and the relationship to the conductor's dielectric constant and conductivity. The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the charge density as a function of time, suggesting an exponential decay model.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of charge conservation and the relationship between current density and charge density. There are attempts to clarify the mathematical expressions involved, including the correct form of the equations and the implications of Ohm's law in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and corrections regarding the mathematical formulation. Some participants question the validity of Ohm's law under certain time scales, while others defend its applicability, indicating a divergence in interpretation that remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the assumptions related to the time scales involved in the problem, particularly concerning the validity of Ohm's law and the conditions for electrostatic equilibrium. Participants are navigating these assumptions without reaching a consensus.

th5418
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We know that free charges inside a conductor will eventually move to the conductor surface. Consider a free charge initially placed inside a conductor at t=0. Show that the free charge density \rho_f will dissolve exponentially with time. Express the characteristic time needed to dissolve the charge in terms of the conductor's dielectric constant \epsilon and the conductivity \sigma.

Homework Equations


I think I should use charge conservation. I'm not sure...
delJ + \frac{d\rho}{dt} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I know what the solution should be..
\rho (t) = \rho_0 e^{t}
where t=\frac{\epsilon}{\sigma}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
th5418 said:
I think I should use charge conservation. I'm not sure...
delJ + \frac{d\rho}{dt} = 0

Assuming you mean \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\textbf{J}+\frac{d\rho}{dt}=0[/tex] (i.e. div<b>J</b> not &quot;delJ&quot; ), that seems like a good start to me...is there some relationship between \textbf{J} and \sigma that might help you here?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":wink:" title="Wink :wink:" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=":wink:" /><br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source="" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> I know what the solution should be..<br /> \rho (t) = \rho_0 e^{t}<br /> where t=\frac{\epsilon}{\sigma} </div> </div> </blockquote>Surely you mean \rho(t)=\rho_0 e^{-t/\tau}, where \tau\equiv\epsilon/\sigma...right?
 
Just a hint: Rearranging the equation
\vec \nabla \cdot \vec J = -\frac{d \rho}{dt}

Can you express \vec J in terms of \rho (t) ?
 
\vec \nabla \cdot \vec J = -\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial t}

and you should use the relation:

\vec J = \sigma\vec E

where \vec\nabla \cdot \vec E=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon}
 
Ohm's law:

\vec{J}=\sigma \vec{E}

is not valid on the relevant time scale for this problem.
 
No! Ohm's law is still valid. Only when the time is shorter than \tau (which we will figure out when we solve the DE) Ohm's law turns out an invalid assumption. Because after time \tau, electrostatic equilibrium is reached, and finding \tau is our concern.
 
Last edited:
caduceus said:
No! Ohm's law is still valid. Only when the time is shorter than \tau (which we will figure out when we solve the DE) Ohm's law turns out an invalid assumption. Because after time \tau, electrostatic equilibrium is reached, and finding \tau is our concern.

Ohm's law is valid on time scales much longer than the typical collision time. The time scale \tau in this problem will be many orders of magnitude less than that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K