How Does Chirality Affect the Dirac Adjoint in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter synoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chirality Dirac
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
synoe
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I have a question about chirality.
When a spinor [itex]\psi[/itex] have plus chirality, namely
[tex] \gamma_5\psi=+\psi,[/tex]
how can I write this condition for the Dirac adjoint [itex]\bar{\psi}=\psi^\dagger i\gamma^0[/itex]?

Let me choose the signature as [itex]\eta_{\mu\nu}=\mathrm{diag}(-,+,+,+)[/itex] and define [itex]\gamma_5\equiv i\gamma^0\gamma^1\gamma^2\gamma^3[/itex]. Taking the Dirac adjoint of the left hand side of the above equation,
[tex] (\gamma_5\psi)^\dagger i\gamma^0=\psi^\dagger\gamma^\dagger_5i\gamma^0\\<br /> =\psi^\dagger(-\gamma^0\gamma^0)\gamma_5i\gamma^0\\<br /> =\bar{\psi}\gamma^0\gamma^0\\<br /> =-\bar{\psi}\gamma_5,[/tex]
so the chirality condition seems to be rewritten as
[tex] \bar{\psi}\gamma_5=-\bar{\psi}.[/tex]

However, for example, considering a quantity [itex]\bar{\psi}\gamma_5\psi[/itex], this result is inconsistent. Where is wrong in the above calculation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not inconsistent, since ##\bar{\psi}\gamma_5 \psi =0## if ##\psi## is chiral. Essentially you have already proved it, but you can also verify it in terms of the chiral components.