How Does Conformal Transformation Affect Curve Types in General Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spookyfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curves
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
spookyfish
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi. This problem is about General Relativity. I am not actually taking a course, but studying myself. I tried to solve Hobson 2.7:

Homework Statement


A conformal transformation is not a change of coordinates but an actual change in
the geometry of a manifold such that the metric tensor transforms as [itex]\bar{g}_{ab}(x)=\Omega^2(x) g_{ab}(x)[/itex], where [itex]\Omega (x)[/itex] is some non-vanishing scalar function of position. In a pseudo-Riemannian manifold, show that if [itex]x^a(\lambda)[/itex] is a null curve with respect to [itex]g_{ab}[/itex] (i.e. [itex]ds^2=0[/itex] along the curve), then it is also a null curve with respect to [itex]\bar{g}_{ab}[/itex]. Is this true for timelike curves?

Homework Equations



for null curves:
[tex] ds^2=g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} (d\lambda)^2=0<br /> \\<br /> \therefore g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda}=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


after the conformal transformation, we have
[tex] ds^2=\Omega^2 g_{\mu \nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu<br /> =g_{\mu \nu}(\Omega dx^\mu) (\Omega dx^\nu)[/tex]
and along the path [itex]x^\mu(\lambda)[/itex]:

[tex] ds^2=g_{\mu \nu} \left[\frac{d}{d\lambda}(\Omega dx^\mu) \frac{d}{d\lambda}(\Omega dx^\nu) \right] (d\lambda)^2<br /> <br /> \\=g_{\mu \nu}\left(\frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda}dx^\mu +\Omega \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \right)<br /> \left(\frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda}dx^\nu +\Omega \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} \right) (d\lambda)^2<br /> <br /> \\=g_{\mu \nu} \left\{ \left(\frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda}\right)^2 dx^\mu dx^\nu<br /> +\Omega \frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda} \left(dx^\mu \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} + \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} dx^\nu \right) +\Omega^2 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} \right\} (d\lambda)^2<br /> <br /> \\= g_{\mu \nu} \left\{ \left(\frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda}\right)^2 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} (d\lambda)^4<br /> + 2\Omega \frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda} \left(\frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} \right) (d\lambda)^3<br /> + \Omega^2 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} (d\lambda)^2 \right\}<br /> <br /> \\= \left( g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} \right) <br /> \left( \left(\frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda}\right)^2(d\lambda)^2+ 2\Omega \frac{d\Omega}{d\lambda}d\lambda +\Omega^2 \right)(d\lambda)^2 = 0[/tex]

now in the last line, the first term vanishes because of the null curve for the original [itex]g_{\mu \nu}[/itex], so the whole [itex]ds^2[/itex] after the transformation vanishes, which means it is a null curve.

Is this solution correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, spookyfish.

It seems to me to be more straightforward. Before the transformation you have a curve for which any infinitesimal displacement ##dx^\mu## along the curve satisfies
[tex] ds^2= g_{\mu \nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu<br /> = 0[/tex]
After the transformation you have a new metric ##\overline{g}_{\mu \nu} = \Omega^2 g_{\mu \nu}##. But the spacetime coordinates of points in the manifold have not changed their values.

So, what is the value of ##d\overline{s}^2= \overline{g}_{\mu \nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu## for the same ##dx^\mu##?
 
The value would be
[tex] d\bar{s}^2 =\Omega^2 g_{\mu \nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu [/tex]
but we need to check [itex]d\bar{s}^2[/itex] of a curve. Can I say that
[tex] d\bar{s}^2 =\Omega^2 g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} (d\lambda)^2=0 [/tex]
because [itex]g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} (d\lambda)^2=ds^2=0[/itex]?
Also, using this would not imply that timelike curves and spacelike curves remain the same, because [itex]\Omega^2[/itex] doesn't change the sign of [itex]ds^2[/itex]?
 
Yes, that all sounds correct.

I don't see the need to explicitly introduce the curve parameter ##\lambda##, because ##d\bar{s}^2 =\Omega^2 g_{\mu \nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu## and ##d\bar{s}^2 =\Omega^2 g_{\mu \nu} \frac{dx^\mu}{d\lambda} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\lambda} (d\lambda)^2## have the same value. But, you can if you want.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person