Calculating Energy-Momentum Tensor in GR

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the energy-momentum tensor in the context of General Relativity, specifically focusing on the variation of the action for a scalar field. Participants are analyzing the expression for the action and its variation, questioning the presence of factors and the correctness of indices used in the derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the variation of the action, with some questioning the presence of a factor of 1/2 in the expression. There are discussions about the correct use of indices and the implications of these on the derivation of the energy-momentum tensor.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's derivations. Some have pointed out potential errors in the original poster's calculations, while others have acknowledged the need for careful attention to detail regarding signs and factors in the equations. There is no explicit consensus yet on the final form of the energy-momentum tensor.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance they can provide. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify mathematical expressions and assumptions related to the problem.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
During the derivation of the Einstein field equations via the variation principle we defined the energy momentum tensor to be
$$T_{\mu\nu} \equiv -2\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\frac{\delta S_M}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}}.$$
Assume now that
$$S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla^\mu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2),$$
where ##\phi## is the scalar field. $Calculate ##T_{\mu\nu}##.
Relevant Equations
All given above
My attempt was to first rewrite ##S_M## slightly to make it more clear where ##g_{\mu\nu}## appears
$$S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} (g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2).$$
Now we can apply the variation:
$$\begin{align*}
\delta S_M
&= \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x (-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu} )(g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}\left(- \frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu} [g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2] + \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi \right)\delta g^{\mu\nu}\\
&= \int d^4x \frac{\sqrt{-g}}{2}\left(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}m^2\phi^2 \right)\delta g^{\mu\nu}.
\end{align*}$$
We then have
$$\frac{\delta S_M}{\delta g^{\mu\nu}} = \frac{\sqrt{-g}}{2}\left(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}m^2\phi^2 \right) \quad \Rightarrow \quad T_{\mu\nu} = - \left(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi+\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}m^2\phi^2 \right)$$
Is this sensible? I'm not really sure if I performed the variation correctly, so I would appreciate if someone could give it a look.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Markus Kahn said:
Assume now that
$$S_M = \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}(\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla^\mu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2),$$
where ##\phi## is the scalar field. $$
Usually there is a factor of 1/2 multiplying ##\nabla_\mu\phi\nabla^\mu\phi##. I just wanted to verify that for your problem there is no such factor of 1/2.
$$\begin{align*}
\delta S_M
&= \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x (-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu} )(g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi
\end{align*}$$
In the second line you have too many ##\mu##, ##\nu## indices which is causing problems in your derivation.
In the second line, I suggest writing ##(g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2)## with different summation indices, e.g., as ##(g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2)##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
You are absolutely right, there should be a ##1/2## in front of the first term... I completely overlooked this. With this in mind we have
$$
\begin{align*}
\delta S_M
&= \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi\\
&= \int d^4x (-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}g_{\mu\nu}\delta g^{\mu\nu} )(\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi \\
&= \int d^4x \sqrt{-g}\left( -\frac{1}{2}g_{\mu\nu}\left[\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2\right] + \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi \right)\delta g^{\mu\nu}
\end{align*}
$$
Which then would give
$$T_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\nu}\left[\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2\right] -2 \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi.$$
I don't see how this could be simplified further (if it can), maybe contracting one of the covariant derivatives with the metric, but other than that...
 
Markus Kahn said:
$$
\delta S_M = \int d^4x (\delta\sqrt{-g}) (\frac{1}{2}g^{\alpha\beta} \nabla_\alpha\phi\nabla_\beta\phi-\frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2) + \int d^4x \sqrt{-g} \delta g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_\mu\phi\nabla_\nu\phi$$
That missing factor of 1/2 should also appear in the second integral above.

Getting all the signs right is a headache. I haven't checked them carefully. Make sure you have all your signs correct in the original expression for the action.

I don't see any way to simplify the answer further.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Markus Kahn

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K