How Does Engine Power Affect Fuel Mass Flow Rate in Diesel Engines?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between engine power and fuel mass flow rate in diesel engines, specifically analyzing a Willans line graph plotted at 1000 RPM. The graph indicates a linear trend up to approximately 75% engine load, after which the fuel mass flow rate increases more dramatically, suggesting a non-linear relationship. The participants highlight that higher fuel volumes necessitate longer injection times, leading to increased engine friction at full load. Mechanical losses can be estimated by extrapolating the low power end of the Willans line to zero fuel consumption, revealing friction losses between 2 kW and 4 kW.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Willans line analysis in diesel engines
  • Familiarity with fuel mass flow rate concepts
  • Knowledge of engine power dynamics at fixed RPM
  • Basic grasp of mechanical losses in engine performance
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of Willans lines in diesel engines
  • Explore the effects of injection timing on fuel efficiency
  • Study the relationship between engine load and friction losses
  • Learn about advanced fuel flow measurement techniques in diesel engines
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, automotive researchers, and diesel engine performance analysts seeking to understand the dynamics of fuel mass flow rate in relation to engine power and efficiency.

Alex91
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have been plotting a Willans line, (engine power against fuel mass flow rate) and I noticed that the line is fairly linear up to about 75% and then it starts to increase a bit more dramatically.

  • So I was wondering how does engine power at a fixed RPM effect fuel mass flow rate?
  • Is it directly proportional or is it squared? And how would you prove this?
  • Is there an equation that you can use that shows how the two affect each other?

Any Help is much appreciated.

Cheers

Alex
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Alex91 said:
… then it starts to increase a bit more dramatically.
Which increases, the power or the fuel flow?
It would help if you could post a copy of the graph with annotations on the scales.

High fuel flow will require a greater time to inject so it will not be as efficient.
 
Hi,

Thanks for the reply.

I have attached a graph of the power against fuel mass flow rate at 1000rpm.

As the engine reaches it's full load, the fuel mass flow rate starts to increase a lot more dramatically. As you can see from the graph, the last four points don't really follow the linear trend of the rest of the graph..

It's almost as if at the very highest loads the engine friction increases a lot more for some reason.

Cheers

Alex
 

Attachments

  • Fuel against power.jpg
    Fuel against power.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 646
Your graph shows what looks like a very gentle exponential curve. The curvature is I believe due to the higher fuel volumes requiring a greater period of injection. The line should not be expected to be straight.

Alex91 said:
It's almost as if at the very highest loads the engine friction increases a lot more for some reason.
As the two end points fall below the exponential trend, an opposite conclusion is also possible. I cannot explain those two or three points at the high kW end. It is possible that there could be a significant error in the 14 kW measurement. Whatever the interpretation, it is the wrong end of the graph to yield an estimate of the mechanical losses at the test RPM.

The mechanical losses can be estimated by extrapolating the low power end of the Willans line to zero fuel consumption. The negative x–axis intercept then represents the mechanical power loss. That is the friction of the motor at the test RPM. The extension about the origin is missing from your graph so the extrapolation is not easy. See my attached approximation that shows mechanical losses are somewhere between 2 kW and 4 kW.
 

Attachments

  • extrapolated.jpg
    extrapolated.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 687

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K