How does failing a class affect your chances of getting a PhD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumTheory
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phd
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the aspirations of a 17-year-old contemplating a PhD in various fields, including Japanese linguistics, philosophy, and mathematics. Participants address the length and requirements of PhD theses, noting that while some dissertations can be shorter, most are significantly longer, often exceeding 80 pages. The conversation highlights the extensive time commitment involved in earning a PhD, typically ranging from 4 to 8 years, regardless of the field.Participants also discuss motivations for pursuing a PhD, emphasizing that many do so out of passion for their subject rather than solely for job prospects. The value of a PhD in academia versus industry is debated, with some suggesting that it may not always lead to better job opportunities. The importance of undergraduate performance is also mentioned, with a high GPA being beneficial for PhD applications. Overall, the thread reflects on the challenges and considerations of pursuing advanced degrees in various disciplines.
  • #51
Astronuc said:
Add to this list - DocToxyn with PhD in Toxicology
And besides Marlon, PhD's to be include Clausius2 and Gokul43201, and there are perhaps others.
Morbius with PhD in physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
___ said:
danger(seeing that s/he has loads of un-understandable by any 13 yr old posts and also being a matured man(atleast by age)).
i guess i am not being that offensive here :biggrin:
:smile: :smile: Not even close!

And you're right that chronologically I'm more mature than most people here.
In all other respects, I'm closer to the aforementioned 13 yr old. :biggrin:
 
  • #53
Danger said:
:smile: :smile: Not even close!
And you're right that chronologically I'm more mature than most people here.
In all other respects, I'm closer to the aforementioned 13 yr old. :biggrin:
So that IS your real picture in the avatar
 
  • #54
Huh? Are you saying that you didn't believe me? Of course it's me. :-p
 
  • #55
Gale, what's your father's company?
 
  • #56
Gale said:
at any rate, i have a question still. how important is undergrad if you go for a phd?
An undergraduate degree lays the groundwork for either a job in the field of study, or advanced degrees. Without a degree from an accredited institution, one could take the qualifying examination for a PhD and otherwise convince the faculty that one possesses an understanding of the field of study, and one is capable of doing independent research and contributing to the field.

As for switching fields - Louis de Broglie (Nobel Prize, Physics, 1929) -
Louis de Broglie's father was Victor, Duc de Broglie, and his mother was Pauline d'Armaillé. Louis studied at the Lyceé Janson de Sailly in Paris completing his secondary school education in 1909. At this stage he did not envisage a career in science, but was interested in taking literary studies at university. He entered the Sorbonne in Paris taking a course in history, intending to make for himself a career in the diplomatic service. At the age of 18 he graduated with an arts degree but he was already becoming interested in mathematics and physics. After being assigned a research topic in history he chose, after worrying greatly about the decision, to study for a degree in theoretical physics.
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Broglie.html

and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-Victor_de_Broglie
 
  • #57
BAE systems. my father is well enough up in the company to be able to secure me a job if i had my math degree. once in the company, assuming i was successful, there'd be a lot of room for growth and all that since its a big company.

Anyway, i was more curious about like... gpa during undergrad. like, how important is it that you do WELL during undergrad if you're going for a phd?
 
  • #58
Gale said:
BAE systems. my father is well enough up in the company to be able to secure me a job if i had my math degree. once in the company, assuming i was successful, there'd be a lot of room for growth and all that since its a big company.
Anyway, i was more curious about like... gpa during undergrad. like, how important is it that you do WELL during undergrad if you're going for a phd?
I would say, get a GPA as high as possible, assuming it reflects one's knowledge and capability/competence. The idea is to learn the mathematics and concepts of one's field of study. As one goes onto advanced studies, one tends to specialize in one or two areas.

If one wants to go into research, and particularly, if one wants to lead or manage resarch, then one essentially needs to have a PhD or be very good.

In the company where I work, the three principal owners/managers are PhDs, and the rest are PhD or MS. We hire undergrads as interns and part-timers, but full-timers must have at least an MS.
 
Last edited:
  • #59
If you decide to go for a Ph.D. be sure to pick (a) the right school and (b) the right thesis advisor!
 
  • #60
How does failing a class in your b.sc. years affect your ability of getting a masters or a PhD, bureaucratic-wise?
 
  • #61
Treadstone 71 said:
How does failing a class in your b.sc. years affect your ability of getting a masters or a PhD, bureaucratic-wise?

:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: I want to know too... not that i failed any 3rd semester calculus classes last year because it was too early to consistently go to class or anything like that... just curious :rolleyes:
 
  • #62
Astronuc said:
An undergraduate degree lays the groundwork for either a job in the field of study, or advanced degrees. Without a degree from an accredited institution, one could take the qualifying examination for a PhD and otherwise convince the faculty that one possesses an understanding of the field of study, and one is capable of doing independent research and contributing to the field.


What is this qualifying examination? Is this like a GRE subject test?
 
  • #63
Lisa! said:
Morbius with PhD in physics.
Thanks Lisa! A terrible oversight on my part.
 
  • #64
kant said:
What is this qualifying examination? Is this like a GRE subject test?
Please refer to this as an example - http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/graduate/exam_handbook.html,
http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/graduate/exam_qualifying.html

The qualifying exam is unique to the particular department and university, and the particulars will vary among different institutions, but usually there a written exam, and there may be an oral exam as well. The written exam involves solving detailed problems in a way that one demonstrates one's basic knowledge in a particluar field. In an oral exam, one stands in front of several faculty members as they pose problems and questions on basic and specialized knowledge.

When I qualified for a PhD, I took an 8 hr written test in 2 4-hr sessions much like that described in RPI's handbook. The problems presented are much like homework problems in which one has to apply forumulas, reasoning, perform calculations, and basically demonstrate a certain level of competency.

The qualifying exam is in addition to the GRE. When a took the GRE, IIRC it was a multiple choice exam, much like the SAT in the US.

One can apply for a PhD program and take the qualifiers during the program, however that would assume one has fulfilled admission requirements, such as application, letters of recommendation, completion of an undergrad program, usually in the same or related field, or Master's program. Coming from a completely different field or from similar or unrelated professional field, one would likely have to take the qualifiers as part of the admissions process.

Perhaps our PhD members can elaborate on their experiences. There are perhaps differences between US and foreign universities.
 
  • #65
Treadstone 71 said:
How does failing a class in your b.sc. years affect your ability of getting a masters or a PhD, bureaucratic-wise?
Well, if there is a limited number of positions then the department may select a more accomplished student.

If one has failed a course, then one would be required to demonstrate what one has done in the intervening period to assure that one has developed a certain minimal proficiency or competence in that area.

Basically, the faculty, and for that matter, a prospective employer, wants some assurance that the person they accept into the acacdemic program or job, is capable of performing at an expected level. If one fails an academic course, then one has to remediate that deficiency. Retaking the course and passing with an acceptable mark is one way, or taking a higher level course and achieving average or better than average is another way.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
976
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top