How Does Gauss' Theorem Explain Tension in a Wire Connecting Charged Spheres?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the tension in a wire connecting two identical conducting spheres, each with a radius of 0.460 cm, when a charge of 69.2 microCoulombs is placed on one of the spheres. The problem involves applying Gauss' Theorem and understanding the distribution of charge on the spheres and the wire.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the symmetrical distribution of charge on the spheres and the implications for tension in the wire. Questions arise about how the charge is distributed and whether it affects the wire. Some participants explore the relationship between the electric field and the forces acting on the spheres.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering hints and clarifications about the behavior of charges on conductors and the application of relevant equations. There is an exploration of different interpretations regarding the charge distribution and its effects on the tension in the wire.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the appropriate equations and the treatment of the spheres as point charges. There are references to the need for specific details about the charge distribution and the geometry involved, indicating that some information may be missing or unclear.

mitleid
Messages
56
Reaction score
1
Two identical conducting spheres each having a radius of 0.460 cm are connected by a light 1.20 m long conducting wire. Determine the tension in the wire if 69.2 (micro)C is placed on one of the conductors. (Hint: Assume that the surface distribution of charge on each sphere is uniform.)

Round your answer to three significant figures. Take the Coulomb constant to be K_e = 8.99 *10^9 N*m^2/C^2

E = K_e (q/r^2) Field on conducting sphere (needed to produce force on string)
E = (1/2*\Pi*\epsilon) q/r^2 Field on -infinite- charged wire (where Epsilon = 8.854*10^-12 C^2/N*m^2)

Force = qE

So far I'm fairly stumped by this problem, though I've been applying Gauss' Theorum most of this afternoon... The charge must be distributed symmetrically, first throughout the sphere in which it is placed. I can solve for the charge at the surface of the first sphere to get something like 2.94 * 10^10 N-C.

From here, I'm thinking the positive charge will be distributed through the conducting wire to the other sphere equally... So each sphere will end up having the same surface charge density and field, which produces a tension on the wire.

Even some conceptual help here would be thoroughly appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: once the charges are distributed evenly... think of the wire just like a rope, or a string... that is preventing the spheres from moving away from each other... what is the force one sphere exerts on the other?
 
mitleid said:
Two identical conducting spheres each having a radius of 0.460 cm are connected by a light 1.20 m long conducting wire. Determine the tension in the wire if 69.2 (micro)C is placed on one of the conductors. (Hint: Assume that the surface distribution of charge on each sphere is uniform.)

So far I'm fairly stumped by this problem, though I've been applying Gauss' Theorum most of this afternoon... The charge must be distributed symmetrically, first throughout the sphere in which it is placed. I can solve for the charge at the surface of the first sphere to get something like 2.94 * 10^10 N-C.

How did you arrive at this value? Note that the two spheres are conductors: where on the spheres is the net charge going to end up? What is the effective behavior of the charge found on each sphere?

From here, I'm thinking the positive charge will be distributed through the conducting wire to the other sphere equally... So each sphere will end up having the same surface charge density and field, which produces a tension on the wire.

This part is fine: the mutual repulsion of the equally-charged spheres leads to the tension in the connecting wire. So the critical question at this point is: how do we treat the fields around each sphere? There is an important theorem they should have told you about that will be valuable here... (As you said, the charge on each sphere is [spherically] symmetrically distributed.)
 
The net charge ends up distributed symmetrically over both of their surfaces. Will some of the charge be distributed in the wire as well?

I'm using the equation E = (q/r^2)Ke... but do I divide the charge by two first? Unfortunately I'm away from my notes and can't isolate the proper theorum... Also, I have used the radius of .6 cm as well as .25/2 + .6 as the radius in my calculations, but it hasn't worked as of yet. Still missing something...
 
mitleid said:
The net charge ends up distributed symmetrically over both of their surfaces. Will some of the charge be distributed in the wire as well?

I'm using the equation E = (q/r^2)Ke... but do I divide the charge by two first? Unfortunately I'm away from my notes and can't isolate the proper theorum... Also, I have used the radius of .6 cm as well as .25/2 + .6 as the radius in my calculations, but it hasn't worked as of yet. Still missing something...

No, you can ignore the charge distributed on the wire...

Think of the spheres as point charges (where the distance between them is the distance between the centers of the spheres)... what is the force one sphere exerts on the other?

Where are you getting the .25/2 and .6?
 
Incredible! Thanks very much for the help, this is how I got the solution :

Based on Coulomb's Law, Force(of E field) = Ke*[(q1*q2)/r^2)], where q1 and q2 are equal to one another here (just divide the charge applied to one sphere by two, and square it).

The tricky part was, as usual, using the correct radius. The important distance is from the center of each sphere, which really treats them both as point charges. Plugging in, I got an answer of 1.21 N.

Thanks again for the help. :)
 
mitleid said:
Unfortunately I'm away from my notes and can't isolate the proper theorum...

The theorem I was referring to concerns a finite spherically symmetrical charge distribution. Your conducting spheres will each have (effectively) half the total charge "uniformly" arranged on their surfaces, thus each is such a symmetrical distribution. The theorem states that the total charge can then be treated as if it were a point at the center of the sphere. (IIRC, this was originally proved by Newton for mass and gravity using *geometry* -- the proof became simpler with his calculus methods.) So the radii of the conducting spheres is an irrelevant detail.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K