How Does General Relativity Affect Star Orbits Around Schwarzschild Black Holes?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of General Relativity (GR) on the orbits of stars around Schwarzschild black holes. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of star orbits, the conversion of position and velocity vectors to spherical coordinates, and the implications of GR on these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using Newtonian methods to describe a star's orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole, providing initial conditions in Cartesian coordinates.
  • Another participant recommends converting the position and velocity vectors to spherical coordinates and forming 4-vectors to solve the geodesic equation.
  • There is a clarification that in GR, position is not considered a vector, leading to further discussion about displacement vectors and their local nature.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about deriving position and velocity vectors in spherical coordinates and seek explanations.
  • One participant proposes that for calculations outside the event horizon, one could treat the black hole as an ordinary star of the same mass, implying that gravitational effects are similar in that region.
  • There is a repeated emphasis on the local nature of vectors in GR, particularly regarding infinitesimal displacements in the local tangent space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to convert vectors to spherical coordinates and the local nature of vectors in GR. However, there is disagreement about the treatment of position as a vector and the implications of using Newtonian methods versus GR approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion about the mathematical formulation and the assumptions underlying the use of spherical coordinates in GR. There are unresolved questions regarding the practical application of these concepts, such as whether the discussion is aimed at theoretical understanding or computer simulation.

Philosophaie
Messages
456
Reaction score
0
I would like to have a Star orbiting a Schwarzschild Black Hole if the the velocity and position vectors in the galaxy are given. The only thing that comes to mind is the Newtonian method.

The velocity and position vectors of the Star are:

[tex]v = {v_x, v_y, v_z)[/tex]
[tex]r = {x, y, z)[/tex]

where (no acceleration)

[tex]x = v_x * t +x_0[/tex]
[tex]y = v_y * t +y_0[/tex]
[tex]z = v_z * t +z_0[/tex]

convert to spherical

What is the method for GR?

Note:The Schwarzschild metric produces a non zero Riemann Tensor and a Ricci Flat as you well know.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note, in GR position is not a vector.
 
Hi Philosophaie! :smile:
Philosophaie said:
I would like to have a Star orbiting a Schwarzschild Black Hole if

You can ignore that fact that it's a black hole, just use an ordinary star of the same mass …

outside the event horizon, the gravitation is the same. :wink:
 
DaleSpam said:
Note, in GR position is not a vector.

Oh yes, sorry.
GR is non-affine.
But you can have a displacement vector, right?
 
I am unclear how you derive the Position Vector in Spherical coordinates and how to incorporate the velocity vector into Spherical coordinates as well. Please explain.
 
Philosophaie said:
I am unclear how you derive the Position Vector in Spherical coordinates and how to incorporate the velocity vector into Spherical coordinates as well. Please explain.

Plug in your ##x## ##y## ##z## and you get ##r## ##\theta## ##\phi##.
What are you trying to do anyway?
Do you want to create a computer simulation or just solve it on paper?
 
ProfDawgstein said:
Oh yes, sorry.
GR is non-affine.
But you can have a displacement vector, right?
Only locally. I.e. Infinitesimal displacements form vectors in the local tangent space.
 
Philosophaie said:
I am unclear how you derive the Position Vector in Spherical coordinates and how to incorporate the velocity vector into Spherical coordinates as well. Please explain.
There is no position vector in GR.
 
  • #10
DaleSpam said:
Only locally. I.e. Infinitesimal displacements form vectors in the local tangent space.

How would you keep track of the objects position?
Just assign ##x, y, z## or ##r, \theta, \phi## to it?

Only locally. I.e. Infinitesimal displacements form vectors in the local tangent space.

I know.
It's mostly a problem with expressing things using normal language.
 
  • #11
ProfDawgstein said:
How would you keep track of the objects position?
Just assign ##x, y, z## or ##r, \theta, \phi## to it?
Yes, a given point in the manifold can be uniquely identified by a list of it's coordinates. But that list is just a list, not a vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K